aussiebear Posted March 21, 2011 Report Posted March 21, 2011 All a bit oopsy for the early openers: Kiwis +0.2%, Aussies -0.2% and Sth Korea +0.5%. Looks like Nikkers taking the day off. In Aussie sectors, Consumer Staples -0.8% and REITS -0.7% with upside leaders Energy +1.1% and Gold +1%.
aussiebear Posted March 21, 2011 Author Report Posted March 21, 2011 Closed: Vernal Equinox Day http://finance.yahoo.com/intlindices?e=asia
aussiebear Posted March 21, 2011 Author Report Posted March 21, 2011 http://money.cnn.com...s/morning_call/ http://www.kitco.com http://www.kitconet....ase_metals.html
aussiebear Posted March 21, 2011 Author Report Posted March 21, 2011 http://www.engrish.com/2005/04/rich-pork/
specie Posted March 21, 2011 Report Posted March 21, 2011 Hi Aussiebear just wondered if you had heard from Machinehead i usually check up on his postings at the only place i know of - Chris Martensen's site his last post was over 6 weeks ago any ideas?
aussiebear Posted March 21, 2011 Author Report Posted March 21, 2011 Hi Aussiebear just wondered if you had heard from Machinehead i usually check up on his postings at the only place i know of - Chris Martensen's site his last post was over 6 weeks ago any ideas? 'Fraid not...he's always had somewhat of a mysterious persona though, hey...
aussiebear Posted March 21, 2011 Author Report Posted March 21, 2011 All Ords continued on its merry way to close +0.4% for the day. Gold +1.6% remained leading sector followed by IT +1%. Most sectors had minor gains with the only reds being Consumer Staples -0.7% and Consumer Discretionary -0.1%. Mostly green in Asia: China flat, Honkers +1.2%, Singers +0.9% and India -0.4%. On to UK/Europe:
POTUS Posted March 21, 2011 Report Posted March 21, 2011 Hi Aussiebear just wondered if you had heard from Machinehead i usually check up on his postings at the only place i know of - Chris Martensen's site his last post was over 6 weeks ago any ideas? I was banned at that site shortly after the last election. They banned my Avatar first; then banned me for pointing out factual errors in one of the owner's comments. Here's my Avatar from that era-
Trader Joe Posted March 21, 2011 Report Posted March 21, 2011 Mickey Boner Monday's ...are back ...large and in charge Looks like last week was, in fact, another BTFD opportunity
Drano Posted March 21, 2011 Report Posted March 21, 2011 Japanese government says don't worry, no health risk, just because 26 liters of Tokyo's water has the equivalent amount of radiation as a chest Xray. Why would anyone believe anything the Japanese government has to say now about the health hazards of this crisis?
Trader Joe Posted March 21, 2011 Report Posted March 21, 2011 Japanese government says don't worry, no health risk, just because 26 liters of Tokyo's water has the equivalent amount of radiation as a chest Xray. Why would anyone believe anything the Japanese government has to say now about the health hazards of this crisis? The correct way to frame the issue is whether the amount of radiation is an increase over previous Who says that the amount prior to the fallout was zero?
DrStool Posted March 21, 2011 Report Posted March 21, 2011 I was banned at that site shortly after the last election. They banned my Avatar first; then banned me for pointing out factual errors in one of the owner's comments. Fuzzwah being Fuzzwah. I read a something of his a few years ago, on a subject that I know a lot about, and it was good enough to have most of the facts right and sound good, but had factual errors and screwed up logic here and there that led to the wrong conclusions. He's the kind of person who doesn't like having his errors exposed. As for machinehead, magnificently brilliant and I loved having him here, but an extremely bad judge of character with a mercurial temperament. I was more than disappointed when he decided that he would no longer post here. He made a really bad judgment. It was just dead wrong. Unfathomable. I'll never forget that. An absolute genius, but his genius led him badly astray on this.
Drano Posted March 21, 2011 Report Posted March 21, 2011 The correct way to frame the issue is whether the amount of radiation is an increase over previous Who says that the amount prior to the fallout was zero? It wasn't zero, but it sure wasn't a horrific figure like this. Think about it -- if you drink a modest 2 liters of water a day, you're getting a chest xray every 2 weeks.
specie Posted March 21, 2011 Report Posted March 21, 2011 Fuzzwah being Fuzzwah. I read a something of his a few years ago, on a subject that I know a lot about, and it was good enough to have most of the facts right and sound good, but had factual errors and screwed up logic here and there that led to the wrong conclusions. He's the kind of person who doesn't like having his errors exposed. As for machinehead, magnificently brilliant and I loved having him here, but an extremely bad judge of character with a mercurial temperament. I was more than disappointed when he decided that he would no longer post here. He made a really bad judgment. It was just dead wrong. Unfathomable. I'll never forget that. An absolute genius, but his genius led him badly astray on this. an lot of intelligent people have come and gone and stayed here over the years. really incredible.
Trader Joe Posted March 21, 2011 Report Posted March 21, 2011 It wasn't zero, (what was it?) but it sure wasn't a horrific figure like this. (how do you know?) Think about it -- if you drink a modest 2 liters of water a day, you're getting a chest xray every 2 weeks. (are you just parrotting nonsense put forth by some idiot in the MSM or do you have the figures and calculation that get to that conclusion?) Signed, A Douche
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.