aussiebear Posted September 7, 2010 Report Posted September 7, 2010 Looking a bit iffy for the early openers: Kiwis +0.5%, Aussies +0.2%, Nikkers and Sth Korea flat and Singers -0.1%. Aussie market sectors are scrambled: Financials +0.6% is leading the green end with IT -1.4% at the other.
aussiebear Posted September 7, 2010 Author Report Posted September 7, 2010 http://finance.yahoo.com/intlindices?e=asia
aussiebear Posted September 7, 2010 Author Report Posted September 7, 2010 http://money.cnn.com...s/morning_call/ http://www.kitco.com http://www.kitconet....ase_metals.html
aussiebear Posted September 7, 2010 Author Report Posted September 7, 2010 Taking it easy today. All Ords closed -0.1% with IT -1.7% down the most. Gains were modest for the green sectors: Financials +0.6% and Utilities +0.4%. Asia static: China flat, Honkers +0.1%, India +0.3% and Nikkers -0.8%. On to UK/Europe:
alceringa Posted September 7, 2010 Report Posted September 7, 2010 Interlude Perfect face. Perfect musician. Perfect song. Perfect message. Just Perfect.
DrStool Posted September 7, 2010 Report Posted September 7, 2010 I have the pleasure of a dentist's appointment this morning. See you later!
Rationalize Posted September 7, 2010 Report Posted September 7, 2010 I still can't get my head around this. When GS makes money with it's own capital they take 50% of it. They will be real lucky to get 10% of OPM. Say what? Where are those figures from? When they prop trade the firms money, they get all the P&L. I figured GS would just drop the commercial bank disguise. How does GS work as a commercial bank. One that doesn't take deposits no less. Access to the Fed window for 0% bags-O-cash. Plus implied Fed backing lowers debt cost. Plus I believe they have a bunch of debt out there that is Fed or FDIC insured or something like that. It's a somewhat different issue for JPM but as I asked, how in the hell do they just drop their $XX trillion derivatives book? Is there some semantic trick here about what comprises proprietary trading? The deriv book is obviously staying with the firm. I seriously doubt the 20 folks they had in prop were running that. If the derivs are the other side of customer positions -- that ain't prop, that's flow. A week after the JPM news there still is almost no commentary on this that I have seen. Lastly, I am sure Rationalize can offer a better response, and in the process make me look like a complete douche. A 2 fer !!! Nice job.
Drano Posted September 7, 2010 Report Posted September 7, 2010 I have the pleasure of a dentist's appointment this morning. See you later! That may be less painful than what we'll be doing.
I_Am_Madness Posted September 7, 2010 Report Posted September 7, 2010 Still holding my ES shorts from 1101.75 and 1103.
Drano Posted September 7, 2010 Report Posted September 7, 2010 The ultra rich, or those with investable assets of at least $30 million, increased their wealth by 21.5 percent last year http://images.businessweek.com/ss/10/08/0831_expensive_new_homes/index.htm?campaign_id=rss_topSlideShows funny how that statistic is buried in the middle of the article. I'm sure it will give all of the newly and probably permanently unemployed former middle class professionals a lot of comfort if only they knew this. So the question is, how much of that is real wealth i.e. money in the bank, and how much of it is appreciated stocks, "wealth" that can vanish in an instant.
MrHanky Posted September 7, 2010 Report Posted September 7, 2010 Bots alive and well,quads jumped 15 cents in 2 seconds.......
Ags Nightmare Posted September 7, 2010 Report Posted September 7, 2010 TJ, Here's the Crapvision "Derivatives" http://www.cnbc.com/id/15840232?video=1582103503&play=1
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.