Page 1 of 1
Mutual fund probe irrelevant for investors Nothing to see here, move along. . .
#1
Posted 29 October 2003 - 07:30 AM
The scandal that wasn't
Despite its grand scale, Spitzer's mutual fund probe won't change much for individual investors.
October 28, 2003: 4:16 PM EST
By Malina Poshtova Zang, CNN/Money Staff Writer
NEW YORK (CNN/Money) - Market timing, late trading, millions of dollars in average investors' money lost because of secret, sometimes illegal, arrangements between mutual funds, hedge funds and brokers.
At first glance, the burgeoning investigation started by New York State Attorney General Elliot Spitzer has all the markings of the next big scandal on Wall Street, an encore to Spitzer's two-year probe into the too-close ties between stock analysts and investment bankers that resulted in a $1.4 billion settlement this spring. Since Spitzer first announced his probe nearly two months ago, the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth William Galvin have joined in with probes of their own.
But this time, investors are shrugging off the almost daily news of subpoenas, criminal and civil charges, and dismissals of fund managers, brokers, and hedge fund investors.
"It's much ado about nothing in some respects," said Rick Applegate, a certified financial planner and president of First Commonwealth Financial Advisors in Indiana, Pa.
. . .
According to a CNN/Gallup poll conducted this week, investors are listening: 67 percent of respondents in the poll said the investigation would make no difference in their decision whether or not to invest in mutual funds. But 51 percent of respondents also said that they would probably move their money out of a fund that is under investigation.
Despite its grand scale, Spitzer's mutual fund probe won't change much for individual investors.
October 28, 2003: 4:16 PM EST
By Malina Poshtova Zang, CNN/Money Staff Writer
NEW YORK (CNN/Money) - Market timing, late trading, millions of dollars in average investors' money lost because of secret, sometimes illegal, arrangements between mutual funds, hedge funds and brokers.
At first glance, the burgeoning investigation started by New York State Attorney General Elliot Spitzer has all the markings of the next big scandal on Wall Street, an encore to Spitzer's two-year probe into the too-close ties between stock analysts and investment bankers that resulted in a $1.4 billion settlement this spring. Since Spitzer first announced his probe nearly two months ago, the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth William Galvin have joined in with probes of their own.
But this time, investors are shrugging off the almost daily news of subpoenas, criminal and civil charges, and dismissals of fund managers, brokers, and hedge fund investors.
"It's much ado about nothing in some respects," said Rick Applegate, a certified financial planner and president of First Commonwealth Financial Advisors in Indiana, Pa.
. . .
According to a CNN/Gallup poll conducted this week, investors are listening: 67 percent of respondents in the poll said the investigation would make no difference in their decision whether or not to invest in mutual funds. But 51 percent of respondents also said that they would probably move their money out of a fund that is under investigation.
#3
Posted 29 October 2003 - 07:46 AM
bontchev, on Oct 29 2003, 06:40 AM, said:
What exactly is wrong with market timing? I mean, most of us here do it all the time; is it illegal for the fun managers to do it?
Regards,
Vesselin
Regards,
Vesselin
I could be wrong about this, but I believe the issue is that the market timing was not available to all, only institutions/large clients.
Page 1 of 1
Sign In
Register
Help



MultiQuote



