Guest Posted December 4, 2002 Report Posted December 4, 2002 Doc, charts would be a pain only if attached to the message - because then every viewer is downloading them from your server. If they are only referenced via an IMG tag, every viewer's browser is downloading them from the site where they are posted, and this is not taxing your server. Still, can you make the author column narrower - at least for the other forums? Regards, Vesselin
DrStool Posted December 4, 2002 Report Posted December 4, 2002 I moved Night Stool back to LOB to give it greater exposure and to consolidate the forums. There were too many forums not getting enough traffic to justify them standing alone. Night Stool was one. Also going back ot LOB are Jack Mehoff on Options, Machinehead's Cacamodities, and Dr. Bull, if he's still around. However, we have added the Theostoology Forum
DrStool Posted December 4, 2002 Report Posted December 4, 2002 There are no restrictions to linking or uploading charts. I prefer not to have the wide charts on this forum. But if it's ok with everyone else, then it's ok with me. Not sure I could find the setting for the author column width in a reasonable time, and that it wouldn't screw up the board format if I messed with it.
sweefraapp Posted December 4, 2002 Report Posted December 4, 2002 Techs weaker than the rest. Down we go again.
Guest Posted December 4, 2002 Report Posted December 4, 2002 Trying to illustrate what SG mentioned in the morning - that the $CPC turning up is actually a bearish sign. I use the 21-dma instead of the 10-dma. As you can see, when it makes a top and turns down, this corresponds to a bottom in the index. When it makes a bottom and turns up, this corresponds to a top in the index and is, therefore, bearish: Regards, Vesselin
DrStool Posted December 4, 2002 Report Posted December 4, 2002 Don't want to go too far out on the limb, but the cmap for the 5 day cycle low due today may be as low as 897. Wouldn't that be something. Otherwise, SG's projections are consistent with the cycle projections so far.
DrStool Posted December 4, 2002 Report Posted December 4, 2002 Revised 1 day cycle low cmap looks like 905. hmmmm.
simple guy Posted December 4, 2002 Report Posted December 4, 2002 And to think DOC that E-waves are a bunch of hooey... Yeah, right... they definitely dont make me any money ever. Looking again for 26.00 to 26.20 on Q's this morning, as I said... by 1030... then reversal to 26.88 to 27 Followed by move to 24.xx...
DrStool Posted December 4, 2002 Report Posted December 4, 2002 That's the 5th Feed drain in a row. $2.25 bill expiring. Is it possible that yesterday's big drain had something to do with the market turning lower? Hmmmm?
sweefraapp Posted December 4, 2002 Report Posted December 4, 2002 Shoot. I forgot about those 10AM numbers. I wanted to be out to reload.
Charmin Posted December 4, 2002 Report Posted December 4, 2002 Just think 905 cmap and support come together
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.