B4 the Bell Wiki Tiki Endi
361 replies to this topic
Posted 14 August 2004 - 12:49 PM
The only way Iraq might be taken is to commit massive levels of human civilian atrocities and even then, it's a complete crap shoot. The American public won't stand for it and the Arabs --well, that goes without saying. That's where the Russians come in. Buschco, can sit back and go tsk tsk while Putin does a Chechnya on Najaaf. Think this might be the game plan. Russia is increasing its troop levels and defence spending at the present time.
How on earth does the administration plan to "subdue" Iran and Saudi Arabia, when they can't get a grip on Iraq? They may have mushroom clouds in mind. You never know. They're very keen on these new Bunker busting noooklear bombs, which is pretty ominous.
Foreign policy formulated by Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, OH and Moe Larry and Curly!
Hi Hat, Good to hear you're okay. The cat thing had an Auntie Em, Auntie Em feel to it, with you cast as (You and your little cat ToTo too!") Margaret Hamilton.
Posted 14 August 2004 - 12:52 PM
For future reference...Wrap kitty in towel (Kitty Burrito), shove all into cat carrier, lock door.
You make Kitty Scared
I couldn't agree with you more.
From my first post ever...
I fully believe a big part of the reason we have entered bubble 2 is because of the pension liability 10 sigma event that was staring corporate America in the face last year. The pension issue had to be repaired. It seems this manipulated runup in the markets is having the desired effect. However,with non pro forma valuations at hysterical extremes I am convinced "they" will fail. The question is, Its not knowing what will happen but WHEN?
Fast forward 10 months...
As an example Air Canada went into bankruptcy last year because of pension liabilities. We have reorganized and SHOULD reemerge September 30. Did AC learn anything from exposure to the bubble? NO of course not. The employees defined benefit pension plans are still over 70% exposed to the stock market. No restructuring there. I am 100% convinced that we will be bankrupt once again when the market tanks. Pensions will be a disaster. My warnings are laughed at by the people that could bring about change. Until our defined benefit pension plans are changed to defined contribution, Air Canada will be held hostage to a very overvalued equities market. Sadly it is not to be.
Thanks for the heads up on Maudlin.
More artillery for my endless plight.
"If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their money, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them (around the banks), will deprive the people of their property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered." --- Thomas Jefferson
Posted 14 August 2004 - 01:03 PM
Total Bank Credit Flat, The Hidden Money Supply Collapse
Fed Releases update is now posted! Once a week Doc fills you in on the all important Fed weekly releases. Doc gives you his briefs on the charts of the Fed's most important money and credit measures. Take a subscribatory and download your Fed Releases RIGHT NOW!
30 Day Intro Subscribatory. Just $16.99! Get In RIGHT NOW!
30 Day Intro Subscribatory. Just $16.99! Get In RIGHT NOW!
If your portfolio has you feeling irregular, for fast, long lasting relief, take a subscribatory. And support your local Stool!
Posted 14 August 2004 - 01:06 PM
And the BRAINLESS ONE wants to put part of the social security $$$$, on an individual basis, into the market with ZERO GUARANTEES...pun intended.
Posted 14 August 2004 - 01:09 PM
I could be wrong, but I seem to recall that the provision allowing use of corporate yields as a discount rate is only in effect for 2 years.
Posted 14 August 2004 - 01:15 PM
Doug Noland seems to be leaning toward the HyperTiger denouement:
"[I]s there a meaningful risk of hyper-inflation developing? I don't think so....I would ... expect the risk of a major pricing cataclysym is more on the downside (systemic debt collapse) than upside (hyper-inflation)."
Credit Bubble Bulletin: "The Fragile Stability Of Monetary Disorder," 13 August 2004 http://www.prudentbe...blebulletin.asp
Posted 14 August 2004 - 01:16 PM
Only one solution - truce to withdraw. My opine.
Of course the assholes running this invasion are more
likely to use nukes. I wouldn't put it past them.
They don't give a shit for human life.
Just look at the results so far - what have we gotten from this fiasco?
Nothing but dead people, massive deficit and latent shame.
You know who should be ashamed of themselves, but their not and they
will never repent. So expect the worst. It's a 'religious war' now and
is out of control.
But the generals and congress are saying 'We must prevail.'
Butts. End result is escalation.
Posted 14 August 2004 - 01:18 PM
Potassium iodate is widely available without any prescription. It will prevent thyroid uptake of radio-iodine, a dangerous by-product of atomic fission.
Posted 14 August 2004 - 01:42 PM
The IEA said it has underestimated oil use for years and is recognizing that demand now in an annual review. The change comes from higher-than-estimated use in nations outside the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
"This probably helps explain why prices are as high as they are," said Adam Sieminski, Deutsche Bank AG's oil strategist in London. "OPEC is struggling to meet demand for its crude oil."
The 11-nation Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) is pumping near its limits to keep up with demand and build inventories. Crude oil topped US$45 on Tuesday for the first time in the 21-year history of futures trading in New York.
World demand will jump by 1.8 million barrels a day in 2005, after a record gain of 2.5 million this year, the IEA said, confirming previous forecasts.
The price of oil went through $46 (U.S.) a barrel yesterday, setting another record high. Many energy experts say $50 -- a figure unthinkable only a couple of years ago -- is likely. At least one oil anal cyst says $100 is possible. In 1998, the price was about $14. In 2002, it was about $27. How did glut turn into shortage so quickly?
Posted 14 August 2004 - 01:45 PM
yeah, i thought, why talking around the hot pie? Just focus and then make your point crystal clear.FxFox - Ah the eloquance of those words. I never knew Hidelberg could produce such diplomatic phrases.
Butr i have to say, im a bit shocked by myself. I have to admit sounds a bit too limbaughatic.
'patriot' is formed with 'patria' and 'idiot'
Posted 14 August 2004 - 01:48 PM
Pension Funding Equity Act
The excuse was that the Treasury's 2001 "Halloween Day massacre" of the 30-year T-bond forced the change. But they've substituted a higher corporate yield.
Two years from now, if the Dow is at 6000, I guess they'll have to use junk yields ... a composite of Brazilian, Argentine, Russian and Turkish debt would be just dandy.
"GOLD -- it's not just for misers anymore."
"Dollahs -- fire-starters for the K-wave winter." - Drano
"Three humps and a dump." - anotherone, 21 SEP 2004
"No gold was harmed in the making of this movie." - Bizarro Greenspan
[i]"Da Track. Da place where Morons bet on Animals Controlled by Criminals." - our jickiss
Posted 14 August 2004 - 02:46 PM
Yeah, those arabs have some serious explaining to do...like how did OUR oil end up under their sand in the first place?
Answer me that you "shitty bearded nutcases".
Posted 14 August 2004 - 03:19 PM
of course you are right.
But I see it relaistic: Without a sufficient oil supply we are doomed. Plain and simple.
Sure every country should have the right to explore the ressources which are under their surface. But thats theory, reality looks different. You can also take the DeBeers mafiosi as an example. They own large parts of Namibia, the namibian state gets no single cent of those diamonds which DeBeers exploits under the namibian surface.
We beat them in Portiers, we beat them in Vienna, if necessary we bomb them to Havanna
'patriot' is formed with 'patria' and 'idiot'
Posted 14 August 2004 - 03:49 PM
US plans to cut forces overseas by 70,000
The US is expected to announce on Monday that it is pulling 70,000 troops out of Europe and Asia in the largest restructuring of its global military presence since the second world war.
People briefed on the plan say two-thirds of the reductions will come in Europe, most of them military personnel stationed in Germany who will be sent back to US bases.
An additional 100,000 support staff and military families worldwide will be part of the realignment.
While the article indicates that these troops will return to the US, I suspect they
will be re-deployed to the Middle East.
If so, the plus side is they will not be accompanied by families, an expensive element
at best. Wherever families are located, the military services try to employ family members vs others who might be even more highly qualified.
This makes happier soldiers and gives a higher household income, but the practice
of co-located families also expands the size of govt due to required family services
(support services) for medical, housing, schools, legal, and all the other goodies you would get if you lived in the USA. No value judgement offered as I have worked Community Service issues as part of my assignment at SANG some years ago.
Shit for housing, dysfunctional family relations, cover-ups for drug use by Officer's
kids.... yadda yadda! And God forbid we should discuss the alcoholism amongst the Officers themselves... "it didnt exist" Official Denial was the game.
(I originally joined Federal Service to establish an "Alcoholism program" for
civilian and military/family members at our installation. What a nightmare!)
SANG was the place that all MI military members with problems were returned to.
While it may be more exciting to follow the progress of military might and its successes, the real human tragedies of the individual soldier and his family
go unrecognized. It is far different from the performance pressures in the corporate world because the rewards are not dollars but just a bunch of medals, honor and glory. How much can you buy with that? Many military families are on welfare.
Officers have a far better deal than the grunts. Most of our soldiers are grunts.
Its a poverty class that we as a Nation should be ashamed of!
How in the name of God and all sorts of value systems can we send these guys/gals
off to fight in combat (so we don't have to go) and fail to give them the dignity of
sufficient pay and support benefits beyond the survival level?
I haven't even touched on a war's byproduct of injured and disabled.
The Bush Admin cut the funding needed to take care of them.
Yes, its all about oil. About the time the war started in Iraq, the US Military
began building a huge military base north of Bahgdad that is intended to be
the supreme center of satellite/surveylance of the entire Middle East. We will
be able to "see" what is going on in every surrounding country and then some.
The imperative need to build this base has caused most other projects in Iraq to
fall FAR behind schedule. Iraqi's do not have clean water, reliable electricity, or
basic human safety, but that base is being built.
So for all the good words, for all the ontheground battles, etc., the primary
objective is the building of that base to provide the type of stronghold that
our bases in Germany provided against the Soviets.
Issue: the German people willingly accepted our bases in their country.
The Iraqi and ME peoples do not.
What will be the outcome?
Rambling thoughts by Sherlock
The Daily Stool - Stock Market Message Board