MrHanky Posted February 2, 2010 Report Posted February 2, 2010 Momentum rules.... And as usual we did have the manditory 20 point swing in ES today.
PyurAureo Posted February 2, 2010 Report Posted February 2, 2010 Mister Hanky, Could you please revise the Date for the day's Forum ... Some are easily cornfused Like me
Jimi Posted February 2, 2010 Report Posted February 2, 2010 After listening 5 minutes it's obvious reform is dead. The Volker rule is dead. Volker got hung out to dry. Poor sucker. He was put out for show and will soon be buried again. Totally agree. The window closed when Obama prioritized health care. Anything that passes will not be meaningful reform. Anything that is meaningful reform will be destroyed by the industry's lobbyists.
MrHanky Posted February 2, 2010 Author Report Posted February 2, 2010 Mister Hanky, Could you please revise the Date for the day's Forum ... Some are easily cornfused Like me I think doc has to do it,I don't see a way for me to. Sorry,I am not very smart!
MrHanky Posted February 2, 2010 Author Report Posted February 2, 2010 Quads down a dime AH.... I am sure they will correct that ASAP
capitall Posted February 2, 2010 Report Posted February 2, 2010 QUOTE (bundys_dodge @ Feb 2 2010, 12:40 PM) Blackrock takes at least 5% stake in 1800 companies?. Although this sounds incredible, I am sure there is some mundane explanation to this seeming madness. May be Doc, TJ and other Stool intelligentsia have a different take... http://www.footnoted.org/buried-treasure/b...afternoon-dump/ Jesse: http://jessescrossroadscafe.blogspot.com/2...buying-big.html Karl Denninger: http://market-ticker.org/archives/1927-Whe...-BlackRock.html ---------------------------------------------------------- Capitall So they are very bullish the U.S. equity market in some time frame or other. And they thought the last 2 weeks was a good pullback time for them to get in or to add to positions. So does that make them different from other firms who think we are in a new bull market, as many apparently do? Only in that they are big enough to be able to afford to buy more stock than smaller firms that are bullish can, as far as I can see.
PyurAureo Posted February 2, 2010 Report Posted February 2, 2010 I think doc has to do it,I don't see a way for me to. Sorry,I am not very smart! Not a big deal ... I thought that the Starter had Edit privileges ... mebbe' knot
alceringa Posted February 2, 2010 Report Posted February 2, 2010 Starters can change the thread title by editing their first post, which includes that information. In any case, its fixed now.
bundys_dodge Posted February 2, 2010 Report Posted February 2, 2010 QUOTE (bundys_dodge @ Feb 2 2010, 12:40 PM) Blackrock takes at least 5% stake in 1800 companies?. Although this sounds incredible, I am sure there is some mundane explanation to this seeming madness. May be Doc, TJ and other Stool intelligentsia have a different take... http://www.footnoted.org/buried-treasure/b...afternoon-dump/ Jesse: http://jessescrossroadscafe.blogspot.com/2...buying-big.html Karl Denninger: http://market-ticker.org/archives/1927-Whe...-BlackRock.html ---------------------------------------------------------- Capitall So they are very bullish the U.S. equity market in some time frame or other. And they thought the last 2 weeks was a good pullback time for them to get in or to add to positions. So does that make them different from other firms who think we are in a new bull market, as many apparently do? Only in that they are big enough to be able to afford to buy more stock than smaller firms that are bullish can, as far as I can see. Oops... the Blackrock thing might be a nothing burger. They are asset managers and a lot of this could be coming from their purchase of Barclays Global Investors. These are all assets of the investors (Blackrock's customers), not Blackrock's proprietary investments.
swordfish Posted February 2, 2010 Report Posted February 2, 2010 I post it couple days ago, I repost it again: http://songmun.blox.pl/resource/SP500_intra_structure.png After hitting 38,2% ,now we are waiting for some drop maybe? even it doesnt maater, 1120-1125 and then BANG we drop. Till now, its just moving in the correct way source: http://songmun.blox.pl/2010/01/Czyzby-zmiana-trendu.html
PyurAureo Posted February 2, 2010 Report Posted February 2, 2010 Looks like the Qs are gonna' coast to a stop around 20 cents off of the HOD
itiswhatitis Posted February 2, 2010 Report Posted February 2, 2010 Any tech advanced Stoolies out there know if there are any video cards that I can add to my current system that will allow me to run three monitors? The folks at Best Buy and Staples were unaware of any. I thought that if I added a video card with two slots, then I could use those two with one of the originals, but when you add most video cards, it overrides the factory installed one disabling it. Any ideas? thanks!
fxfox Posted February 2, 2010 Report Posted February 2, 2010 I post it couple days ago, I repost it again: After hitting 38,2% ,now we are waiting for some drop maybe? even it doesnt maater, 1120-1125 and then BANG we drop. Till now, its just moving in the correct way thats some very nice stuff Swordie!
FranciscoTheMan Posted February 2, 2010 Report Posted February 2, 2010 Any tech advanced Stoolies out there know if there are any video cards that I can add to my current system that will allow me to run three monitors? The folks at Best Buy and Staples were unaware of any. I thought that if I added a video card with two slots, then I could use those two with one of the originals, but when you add most video cards, it overrides the factory installed one disabling it. Any ideas? thanks! Yep, I thought it would work like that too, it doesn't. I have two video cards and three screens (19", 22", 19").
Bungster Posted February 2, 2010 Report Posted February 2, 2010 Cramer was on Mad Money last night telling his minions to sell on rallys......Wondering if he'll change his tune this evening?
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.