Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Poll: How Much We Appreciate The Doc


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
6 replies to this topic

Poll: How much do you appreciate doc?

How much do you appreciate doc?

You cannot see the results of the poll until you have voted. Please login and cast your vote to see the results of this poll.
Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 anoscope

anoscope

    Master of Stock Proctology

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,884 posts

Posted 22 November 2002 - 09:15 PM

vote early and often!

#2 DrStool

DrStool

    Chief of Stock Proctology

  • Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 83,442 posts

Posted 22 November 2002 - 09:55 PM

I voted! :P :wacko: :blink:

If your portfolio has you feeling irregular, for fast, long lasting relief, take a subscribatory. And support your local Stool!

#3 torah man

torah man

    Bachelor of Stock Proctology

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 554 posts

Posted 23 November 2002 - 09:51 PM

i voted too.

lots of new features, i like that.

#4 depends

depends

    Doctor of Stock Proctology

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2,198 posts

Posted 24 November 2002 - 09:45 PM

I don't trust these new fangled computerized voting machines. :angry:

I was able to put up my gold webpage again - caution - I have not updated it in months.
http://home1.gte.net...gedok_index.htm

Attached Images

  • eagleflight1small.jpg


#5 anoscope

anoscope

    Master of Stock Proctology

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,884 posts

Posted 25 November 2002 - 12:17 AM

I don't trust these new fangled computerized voting machines. :angry:

In Louisiana, we elected the current candidate for US Senate Suzy Terrell for her pledge to fully implement electronic voting and do away with all the 'people' touching ballots and mechanical voting machines. Within 5 years all in place, and her job is no longer needed! cool. lower costs better accuracy.

now the complaints came in from south Louisiana that poll workers don't trust the electronics as they can't check the votes to be sure what the voter 'intended' when they voted. That means exactly what it meant in FL, they 'adjusted' the ballots after the election was done for the obvious reasons.

In 1996, more than 10,000 votes were 'made' on the mechanical machines than signed voter polls. A few precints even had greater than 100% voter turnout!

All poll precints have at least 2 paid workers (election only, per day pay). Then there are poll watchers that are there for a variety of reasons..voter fraud deterrence, voter identification (prev id'd pro-your-candidate voters are checked off as they vote and the list is used to contact those voters who have not yet voted an hour or two before the polls close), and 'concerned' citizens. The last two categories are unusual in that the poll watcher has no say in what precinct they will be 'assigned'. So you have to have hundreds of pollwatchers to 'catch' the precints you really want. The poll watchers are assigned via computer random number, with each covered precinct taken out of the pool of possibles until all precints have at least one assigned poll-watcher.

p.s. I still think that if a person can't read, then they should not be able to vote (not talking about the blind of course!)

#6

  • Guests
  • 0 posts

Posted 25 November 2002 - 09:26 PM

Jimmy Carter watched me vote.

#7

  • Guests
  • 0 posts

Posted 30 November 2002 - 05:59 PM

I voted too, but my friend, Posted Image, seems to have been left behind in the older part of town.





Stock market portfolio giving you the runs? See Dr. Stool.

Take a subscribatory!
Download 
The Anals of Stock Proctology now!



The Daily Stool - Stock Market Message Board
Stool's Gold- Gold and Precious Metals Forum
Look Out Below Message Board

Support your local Stool Board.


The Al E. Greenspeuman designer line at Stoolmart. Get yours today! Click here now!
Get Mugged!


Dr. Stool's
Book Search

Enter title, author, or keyword
Just books
All Products





Old Stool Depository

Live Steaming Pile Chart