Jump to content

Unstoppable freight train of buying


Recommended Posts

That should put the conservative men (come to think of it, their intimate partners as well :rolleyes:) in their place :lol: .....

 

Third female lawmaker introduces bill to limit men’s Viagra access

By Liz Goodwin | The Lookout – Mon, Mar 12, 2012

 

Democratic Ohio state Sen. Nina Turner is the third female lawmaker to introduce a bill that would limit men's access to Viagra and other erectile dysfunction drugs to make a statement about the dozens of anti-abortion bills that have passed statehouses around the country over the last year.

 

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/third-female-lawmaker-introduces-bill-limit-men-viagra-204340160.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 27
  • Created
  • Last Reply

And it gets better..... :lol: :lol:

 

Bill introduced to regulate men's reproductive health

Part of a trend, she likens the bill to men legislating ‘a woman’s womb.’

 

By Jackie Borchardt, Columbus Bureau Updated 11:18 AM Monday, March 12, 2012

 

COLUMBUS – Before getting a prescription for Viagra or other erectile dysfunction drugs, men would have to see a sex therapist, receive a cardiac stress test and get a notarized affidavit signed by a sexual partner affirming impotency, if state Sen. Nina Turner has her way.

 

The Cleveland Democrat introduced Senate Bill 307 this week.

 

http://www.daytondailynews.com/news/dayton-news/bill-introduced-to-regulate-mens-reproductive-health-1341547.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That should put the conservative men (come to think of it, their intimate partners as well rolleyes.gif) in their place laugh.gif .....

 

 

 

http://news.yahoo.co...-204340160.html

 

 

I am a conservative and I agree that taxpayers should not have to pay for others viagra. In fact, anything involving somebody's sex life and personal choices involving there of should not be the responsibility of joe tax payer. When are the American people going to take responsibility for their own actions and choices?

 

If I go out and knock up the girl next door, then that is my responsibility.

 

I remember an article in the local rag about a man who had 23 kids by almost as many mothers. He was in jail and being prosecuted for non support. Not sure how the average man could support 23 kids and deal with nearly as many women. At the least, condoms are much cheaper than child support, and, for some, abstinence may be the best solution.

 

Anyway, only if Bernanke's parents had practiced better birth control....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am a conservative and I agree that taxpayers should not have to pay for others vagina.

 

BWHAHAHAHHA

 

 

I remember an article in the local rag about a man who had 23 kids by almost as many mothers. He was in jail and being prosecuted for non support. Not sure how the average man could support 23 kids and deal with nearly as many women.

 

Answer: They can't and don't

It's one of the oldest scams in the book...get prego, have the kid and collect a check from the state...wash, rinse, repeat

 

been going on for decades

 

The really smart guys say with the same girl, keep gettin her pregnant and just don't get married...Mo Kids, Mo Muny

 

Luvz my govenment cheese!

Now, back to the Mark It's

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no coincidence these stress test are released during expiration weekdon't kid yourself, you know damn well a ship load of calls were being bought on last Tues. "selloff" in anticipation of this, easy money for the elite

 

Or anyone who had any faith in my analysis of the impact of LTRO-- market would sell the news then on to new highs. I took such a browbeating I even began to doubt it. But the fact is that the liquidity analysis was correct, as was the cycle analysis. Going forward, who knows, but so far, so good. I've earned my keep.

 

Thanks to all subscribers who have stuck with the Wall Street Examiner Professional Edition these past few months. It has not been easy for bears at heart, but I've tried to help everyone preserve their capital to the best of my ability, and I think that those who took the analysis seriously were well served. I will continue to do my best to give you a thorough, unbiased, and honest analysis, day in and day out, week in and week out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Or anyone who had any faith in my analysis of the impact of LTRO-- market would sell the news then on to new highs. I took such a browbeating I even began to doubt it. But the fact is that the liquidity analysis was correct, as was the cycle analysis. Going forward, who knows, but so far, so good. I've earned my keep.

 

Thanks to all subscribers who have stuck with the Wall Street Examiner Professional Edition these past few months. It has not been easy for bears at heart, but I've tried to help everyone preserve their capital to the best of my ability, and I think that those who took the analysis seriously were well served. I will continue to do my best to give you a thorough, unbiased, and honest analysis, day in and day out, week in and week out.

 

 

In the past, when the Fed has intervened by lowering interest rates and forcing liquidity into the system, the markets kept going up until the Fed started to raise rates, but didn't roll over and collapse until sometime late in the cycle, when the Fed went too far. The Fed has already stated that they will keep rates low into 2014. In your opinion, will it be the same with this cycle, that the markets will keep rising sometime into the next rate raising cycle, or is there some dynamic about this cycle where a collapse could occur without the need for raising interest rates? This is scary, because the Fed may not start raising rates for a long time. This has the potential to create the bubble of all bubbles, if history is any indication.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not concerned with rates so much. They're a corollary not a cause. It's the quantity of money that matters, and even more important, the conduit that is used to transmit it into the system. The Fed to Primary Dealer thing is very important but the Fed is no longer the only major player. The ECB is co-equal, and to a lesser extent you have to also pay attention to other central banks. They all deal with the same banks. 7 of the largest European banks are Primary Dealers. Virtuall all the PDs play in the European sandbox and the Japanese sandbox too. So what interests me most is the flows between the central banks and these dealer/banks. That's what I am constantly trying to gauge.

 

Think back to 2007. The Fed forced a huge amount of money into the banking system, but they cut the Primary Dealers out of the process and actually robbed them to give to the rest of the system. Voila, market crashed, just as I predicted at the time. So the issues are how much, and who, not what the cost is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

looks to me like some sharp profit-taking today by shorts, but this correction is over now and the downtrend has resumed - already down 2 on SP in nite session

 

bears could easily recoup the last few days' pullback by morning and break it down to fresh new lows for this move

 

still looking for 1050 by Aug, could be a lot lower if more European countries default

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Stool Pigeons Wire Message Board? Tell a friend!
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • ×
    • Create New...