Oyster Posted March 6, 2003 Report Share Posted March 6, 2003 Oyster Have you noticed that the ADX did not rise on your wave 1 count. By combining both, I suspect that the real downtrend did not start until the January high. BTW, am most impressed by your insight. Regards WH yes I completely agree....and I show that count on Crapvision........and my preferred...I play the minimal required....so I will already be alert as if counting a 5 when we are down there just in case.....we must be on our toes..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oyster Posted March 6, 2003 Report Share Posted March 6, 2003 I have a daily cycle turn due +/- March 10th....so things must move fast....or we just hang around here until that date and make a high......Intermediate cycles bottom a little later in March Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tchaikofsky Posted March 6, 2003 Report Share Posted March 6, 2003 Fidelity cuts pension forecast Expects just 7% return, yet future liability up 36% . . . Fidelity saw its future pension liability soar 36 percent last year, to $790.1 million, while the plan shed 2 percent of its assets, because of the market's slide. The annual report provides no details as to the investment mix of the plan. But the firm is now staring at a $415.5 million gap between cash on hand and the money it will have to pay retirees down the road. That's up 65 percent from the end of 2001 - and the figure is now roughly half of 2002 Fidelity's net income. . . . During the boom, from 1996 to 1999, the average pension fund soared from being 85 percent funded to being overfunded, at 131 percent, according to Towers Perrin, a benefits consultancy. But by the end of last year, funding levels had slumped to 80 percent, the lowest since 1993. Fidelity is 47 percent funded; a year ago, it had 57 percent of the money on hand to meet its future obligations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chibear Posted March 6, 2003 Report Share Posted March 6, 2003 There's a lot of talk around this morning about amending the UN resolutuion to give Saddam a "final ultimatum" of two weeks, to do what is not clear. That would stretch things out to the end of March, from the time of possible passage by the security council. End of March, early April is the next new moon period (actual date is April 1!!). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oyster Posted March 6, 2003 Report Share Posted March 6, 2003 My group is going for attack +/- 15th march because that is on a back Spiral from 29th July 2003 a major 'nuclear' date in our books...Too long to go into here....it's the work of a pupil of Chris Carolan's work Roy Fellars Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrStool Posted March 6, 2003 Report Share Posted March 6, 2003 Suctors and Stoolwethers Not much in the way of good shorts here. In fact, almost nothing. A handful of weak uptrends too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chibear Posted March 6, 2003 Report Share Posted March 6, 2003 My group is going for attack +/- 15th march because that is on a back Spiral from 29th July 2003 a major 'nuclear' date in our books...Too long to go into here....it's the work of a pupil of Chris Carolan's work Roy Fellars Thanks, Oyster. Beware the Ides of March? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miss Moneypenny Posted March 6, 2003 Report Share Posted March 6, 2003 Fidelity cuts pension forecast Expects just 7% return, yet future liability up 36% . . . Fidelity saw its future pension liability soar 36 percent last year, to $790.1 million, while the plan shed 2 percent of its assets, because of the market's slide. The annual report provides no details as to the investment mix of the plan. But the firm is now staring at a $415.5 million gap between cash on hand and the money it will have to pay retirees down the road. That's up 65 percent from the end of 2001 - and the figure is now roughly half of 2002 Fidelity's net income. . . . During the boom, from 1996 to 1999, the average pension fund soared from being 85 percent funded to being overfunded, at 131 percent, according to Towers Perrin, a benefits consultancy. But by the end of last year, funding levels had slumped to 80 percent, the lowest since 1993. Fidelity is 47 percent funded; a year ago, it had 57 percent of the money on hand to meet its future obligations. Yep, the time has come when they can't hold this back anymore. Lots more of this coming soon IMO. Raytheon also announced yesterday that they have a big problem with their pension fund. Raytheon Warns on 2004 Earnings Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrStool Posted March 6, 2003 Report Share Posted March 6, 2003 I have a daily cycle turn due +/- March 10th....so things must move fast....or we just hang around here until that date and make a high......Intermediate cycles bottom a little later in March Yep. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oyster Posted March 6, 2003 Report Share Posted March 6, 2003 Like I said yesterday...waterfall should begin today Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 6, 2003 Report Share Posted March 6, 2003 Fokker -- Love the way your dollar and gold charts look today. What's that smell? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrStool Posted March 6, 2003 Report Share Posted March 6, 2003 Didn't like that news, did they? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miss Moneypenny Posted March 6, 2003 Report Share Posted March 6, 2003 My group is going for attack +/- 15th march because that is on a back Spiral from 29th July 2003 a major 'nuclear' date in our books...Too long to go into here....it's the work of a pupil of Chris Carolan's work Roy Fellars Thanks, Oyster. Beware the Ides of March? Troops have been told March 17th with bombing to start 4 days earlier, which would put it smack on March 13th Bradley Turn Date Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miss Moneypenny Posted March 6, 2003 Report Share Posted March 6, 2003 Didn't like that news, did they? Nope. It's Britain's idea -- yeah, right! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tchaikofsky Posted March 6, 2003 Report Share Posted March 6, 2003 My group is going for attack +/- 15th march because that is on a back Spiral from 29th July 2003 a major 'nuclear' date in our books...Too long to go into here....it's the work of a pupil of Chris Carolan's work Roy Fellars Troops 'told of March 17 invasion' 06mar03 BRITISH troops had been told an invasion of Iraq would begin on March 17, with a huge bombing campaign being launched four days earlier, the Daily Express in London has reported. The tabloid quoted a senior government source, who it reported had direct access to British military planning in Kuwait, as saying that "everything is being geared up towards a ground invasion beginning on Monday week". Is a "tabloid" the same thing in the UK as in the US? In other words, sensationalistic? And, if this is true, why do they insist on giving out the information? Trying to level the playing field for Iraq? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.