Janitor Posted June 10, 2004 Report Share Posted June 10, 2004 Thanks Vess And Hello Oyster! Nice to see you dropping in Thanks for charts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
traderfromhell Posted June 10, 2004 Report Share Posted June 10, 2004 Thanks Dr. B and Oyster for all your valuable input. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 10, 2004 Report Share Posted June 10, 2004 Does each virus have its own specific algorithm for encryption? In a word - no. As explained in my paper, most viruses do not use any encryption whatsoever. Most of the viruses for which we, the anti-virus people, say that they are "encrypted" are actually encoded - because both the key and the decryption algorithm are readily available in the body of the virus. And the vast majority of viruses don't even use encoding. Of those that do use encoding or encryption, some use their own algorithms - but also many share common algorithms. Basically, if you're interested in this stuff - read my paper. It covers the issue pretty thoroughly. (My papers usually do. ) Regards, Vesselin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 10, 2004 Report Share Posted June 10, 2004 Oyster, thanks a lot for the charts! It's great to hear from you again! I wish it would happen more often. Regards, Vesselin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howl Posted June 10, 2004 Report Share Posted June 10, 2004 That's it, folks. He didn't comment on the indices, so I would like to add some thoughts of my own about them. Basically, I expect a minor correction (e.g., to SPX 1120) to relieve the short-term overbought condition, followed by a strong rally. I expect the January high to be at least tested - and possibly surpassed. Sorry about the bad news but just too many things point to such a scenario: The Fed is pumping like mad. Recently the M3 money supply has increased by an astonishing rate - I haven't seen them increase it by so much even at major crisises! .... Regards, Vesselin Thanks Vess and Oyster. I give the 'minor correction then new highs' scenario 50% and the 'breakdown' scenario 50%. These numbers are not exact, of course. It looks like an Elliott Waive triangle has been forming in the NDX. This triangle could be many things, like wave 4 of an impulse or the final wave of a complex correction. The volumes are low, and that is usually a bad thing for the bulls. BTW: The FED is not pumping like mad. If you subscribe to the anals, read the feed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 10, 2004 Report Share Posted June 10, 2004 Does each virus have its own specific algorithm for encryption? In a word - no. As explained in my paper, most viruses do not use any encryption whatsoever. Most of the viruses for which we, the anti-virus people, say that they are "encrypted" are actually encoded - because both the key and the decryption algorithm are readily available in the body of the virus. And the vast majority of viruses don't even use encoding. Of those that do use encoding or encryption, some use their own algorithms - but also many share common algorithms. Basically, if you're interested in this stuff - read my paper. It covers the issue pretty thoroughly. (My papers usually do. ) Regards, Vesselin Thank you Vess Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Butterfield 8 Posted June 11, 2004 Report Share Posted June 11, 2004 many thanks Oyster. From a non-ta perspective, I think if gold drops that low it would imply a global recession. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hiding Bear Posted June 11, 2004 Report Share Posted June 11, 2004 Many thanks for the clarifications Oyster. I am thinking along the lines of Butterfield 8 - a higher dollar/lower gold would imply that deflationary forces in the US have at least temporarily taken the upper hand. BTW - M3 reversed some of its gains made over the last few weeks: http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/M3/28 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrStool Posted June 11, 2004 Report Share Posted June 11, 2004 Hi Vess and Oyster! It's great to hear from both of you. A word about very large charts. If your chart is wider than 500 pixels, there are two ways to handle it. Rather than embedding the chart in the post by hotlinking, you can either upload it as an attachment, or simply include a link to the graphic url. If you attach it as an upload, it loads in the post as a thumbnail, which when clicked on, opens the chart full size in a separate window. Likewise if you just include the url to an existing chart on another site. That will keep me out of trouble vis a vis our contract with our advertising agency which requires that all skyscraper ads be visible in the screen without scrolling. Many tanks! And please, do drop em' in more often. I and all Stoolies love you, and miss you! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BumRush Posted June 11, 2004 Report Share Posted June 11, 2004 Thanks Vesselin and Oyster. Hiding Bear posted M3 showing a turn down; Doc has shown in his work that there is less Fed pumping than is popularly believed. Supporting HB Rate of change in M3 shows some pumping (w/recent trending down) but not an unprecedented amt. Doc notes that the Fed is not behind this in any case http://www.economagic.com/em-cgi/charter.e...3sl+1990+0000+1 However M3 velocity, while at a local maxima, is relatively and extremely low- http://www.economagic.com/em-cgi/charter.e.../vel-gdp-per-m3 (Velocity a big issue in 1930s depression BTW....) I know little about this but can it be that relatively low velocity indicates impending deflationary forces - in spite of recent increase in M3? this would seem to fit w/Oysters call for lower gold prices TIA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TGakaTheBigHurt Posted June 11, 2004 Report Share Posted June 11, 2004 Oyster, If you happen to check in again, the recent stock market activity continues to run in synch with its F30 spiral counterpart. OK Doc, got rid of the .doc attachment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrStool Posted June 11, 2004 Report Share Posted June 11, 2004 While TG is a trustworthy source, I just want to remind everyone that downloading a doc file from any source is extremely risky! TG, if the data in your doc is in a gif file, it would be better to separate the gif from the doc and upload it instead, if that is possible. Many tanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goldmember Posted June 11, 2004 Report Share Posted June 11, 2004 Chart 1: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goldmember Posted June 11, 2004 Report Share Posted June 11, 2004 Chart 2: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goldmember Posted June 11, 2004 Report Share Posted June 11, 2004 Chart 3: No words are necesary..... "Uh....I'll take chart #3 for $10,000, Bob." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.