alceringa Posted January 1, 2005 Report Share Posted January 1, 2005 Thanks for the IBD list Mark! Much appreciated! Does anyone know of a free charting service where I can compare more than 5 stocks for relative strength? Yahoo only allows me to compare 5 at a time. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> http://stockcharts.com/webcgi/perf.html?SMH,intc stockcharts.com "Perf" charts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stanley Posted January 1, 2005 Report Share Posted January 1, 2005 The Year of the Rooster (or. chicken or cock, depending on the preferred translation) the new moon time is at 14:28 of 8-Feb-05 in the US Pacific Standard Time and also at 17:28 of 8-Feb-05 in the US Eastern Standard Time, so the Chinese New Year day is on February 8th, 2005 for USA time zones. Rat, Cow, Tiger, Rabbit, Dragon, Snake, Horse, Sheep, Monkey, Chicken, Dog and Pig Year 2005 is Green Wood Male Chicken Full text (includes predictions): http://www.chinesefortunecalendar.com/2005.htm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
longOnUranus Posted January 1, 2005 Report Share Posted January 1, 2005 However can we be sure that MH hasn't already been to at least one of mad AL's tea parties in the Fed's Eccles Board Room? I own several large Paki-Persian silk rugs; there is a definite defect in this rug. Notice it's off to the side of the rear end of the table. From my experience with Grand Juries, this is where the guy on the hot-seat usually sits (I will not detail any further about where my place at such table actually was, nor the circumstances surrounding said appearance). I think MH had a side-bar with Bernanke. Either that, or Al forgot his Depends and couldn't make it out of the room. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 1, 2005 Report Share Posted January 1, 2005 Thanks for the IBD list Mark! Much appreciated! Does anyone know of a free charting service where I can compare more than 5 stocks for relative strength? Yahoo only allows me to compare 5 at a time. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> http://stockcharts.com/webcgi/perf.html?SMH,intc stockcharts.com "Perf" charts <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Thanks buddy! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dozer Posted January 1, 2005 Report Share Posted January 1, 2005 ....and the plot thickens! a good new year to ya LOU. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wndysrf Posted January 1, 2005 Author Report Share Posted January 1, 2005 Dozer: Here's TradingMarkets.com's list of "Stocks Building A Base" Note how many setups are in the energy sector: Stocks Ready to Break Out .................................. There's a huge low pressure system spinning 200 miles offshore of Portland. No wonder you guys are getting hammered. Its basically stationary, churning more moisture and cold snow into the Pacific Northwest........... But it looks like its headed to SoCal, so we are going to get killed with more rain. THE UPPER LOW RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL THIS IS STILL WELL NORTH OF US OFF THE COAST OF PORTLAND, OR. MODELS DROP THE LOW SOUTH AND HAVE IT JUST OFF THE MONTEREY COAST MONDAY AFTERNOON AND AROUND PT CONCEPTION MONDAY EVENING. THE SLOW MOVEMENT OF THIS LOW WILL MEAN ANOTHER EXTENDED PERIOD OF PRECIP FOR OUR AREA, POSSIBLY HEAVY AT TIMES, ESPECIALLY SUNDAY NIGHT INTO MONDAY MORNING WHEN SOUTHERLY FLOW IS THE STRONGEST AND MOISTURE AND DYNAMICS ALOFT ARE MOST FAVORABLE. ONCE AGAIN THE AREAS THAT WILL RECEIVE THE HIGHEST RAINFALL TOTALS WILL BE ALONG THE SOUTH FACING MOUNTAIN SLOPES FROM SANTA BARBARA TO PASADENA WHERE UP TO 6 INCHES OF RAIN COULD FALL BY TUESDAY MORNING. AT LOWER ELEVATIONS PROBABLY SOMEWHERE IN THE 1-2.5 INCH RAIN SEEMS PROBABLE. WILL HOLD OFF ISSUING ANY FLOOD WATCHES FOR THE TIME BEING AS IT DOESN`T LOOK LIKE RAINFALL RATES WILL BE QUITE AS HIGH AS THEY WERE WITH PREVIOUS EVENTS. HOWEVER, THE MAJOR DIFFERENCE THIS TIME AROUND IS THAT THE GROUND IS EVEN MORE SATURATED THAN IT WAS BEFORE AND RUNOFF RESPONSE TIMES WILL BE MUCH FASTER. AND WITH THE POSSIBILITY FOR THUNDERSTORMS MONDAY AND PERHAPS INTO TUESDAY AS WELL WE`LL HAVE TO LOOK CLOSELY AT THE CHANCES FOR FLOODING, ESPECIALLY IN THE BURN AREAS. Watch the storm in real time here: Satellite Loop Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wndysrf Posted January 1, 2005 Author Report Share Posted January 1, 2005 A couple more breakout setups. Nice consolidations, and most of the oscillators are near or at the lows of the range. NUCO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wndysrf Posted January 1, 2005 Author Report Share Posted January 1, 2005 If Boeing gets more 7E7 orders, this one is going to take off.............. Hexcel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dozer Posted January 1, 2005 Report Share Posted January 1, 2005 tanks for that west-coast weather-sat link Mark ! way better than the NWS one I'd been using. and tanks for the base-building info too....I'll do some reading at that TM site... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
traderfromhell Posted January 2, 2005 Report Share Posted January 2, 2005 Chapman Wave: <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Cookin' Maxxi. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PandaBear Posted January 2, 2005 Report Share Posted January 2, 2005 I'm doing a detailed study of RGLD's crash in March of 2003 and see striking similarities to the October crash of 1987. It's all part of my critique of the Efficient Market Hypothesis. I'll post more on that here later. Anyone who wants to join me in ripping the EMH to pieces is more than welcome to add your thoughts and arguments as to why the theory is invalid. I call it the Deficient Market Hypothesis <{POST_SNAPBACK}> If EMH were valid, Warren Buffett should not exist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brown Suguaro Posted January 2, 2005 Report Share Posted January 2, 2005 tanks for that west-coast weather-sat link Mark ! way better than the NWS one I'd been using. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Dozer, That's a great satelite image, but I could not get it to loop - could you? When I got infected at the Weather.com site, I quit using them, but after trying a couple of other recommended sites I was not satisfied, so went back. I have not been infected again. Give these links below a try and see what you think. I have the infrared image set up for loop, and the doppler image can loop by clicking "show map in motion" Like you, I do not have a TV, so I need a good weather site on the internet. http://www.weather.com/maps/maptype/satell...e_animated.html http://www.weather.com/maps/maptype/dopple...ndex_large.html And, by the way, Happy New Year to you. Thanks, too, for all your contributions. I really enjoy your posts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Metamucil Posted January 2, 2005 Report Share Posted January 2, 2005 The most bullish setups appear to be in the energy sector, especially since these stocks have refused to break down after energy prices collapsed. The OSX has lagged, only because of a reluctance of energy CEO's to "believe" that oil prices are here to stay, and commit to new capital spending. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Yes, Wndy... The oil and gas sector is just one big damn wall of worry, eh? Happy New Year everybody! Health is wealth! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dozer Posted January 2, 2005 Report Share Posted January 2, 2005 and a good new year to you as well, BS. I didn't know it was -supposed- to loop on its own In any case, I don't have the bandwidth for anything like a looping image. On this type of thing, I just hit 'reload' when I want to see the most recent update. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wndysrf Posted January 2, 2005 Author Report Share Posted January 2, 2005 Maxxi: You are making it way too complicated. Bottom line is that if a stock gets shanked bigtime while its in bullish phase within a bullish sector, you wait it out for a couple of weeks, then buy it. By the time the stock "proves itself" by breaking out on huge volume, you've already missed the juice from the bottom. Devon Energy crashed out in February 2004 on 14 million shares. And crashed again in late September 2004 on 12 million shares. If you sat around and waited for all these "swing highs" and 'high volume breakouts" to confirm that the stock was safe to buy again, you never would have bought it back. It never had a $10+ million share day again. Ever. Its really simple. Any blowups in a stock in a bullish sector is to be bought with a vengeance. Many of the OSX constituents (HAL, CAM, VRC, GSF) have blown up within the last year on huge volume, and anybody who bought at or near those lows is a big winner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.