DrStool Posted January 3, 2003 Report Share Posted January 3, 2003 Your record speaks for itself SiG. No quarrel from me. I just ain't a fart enough smeller to figger out that old Elliot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Metamucil Posted January 3, 2003 Report Share Posted January 3, 2003 I've never seen this board so bi-polar Bi-polar bears: Where's my upper? Where's my downer? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GregFokker Posted January 3, 2003 Author Report Share Posted January 3, 2003 I'm holding until I see the whites of their highs. But remember to bail if it goes beyond. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrStool Posted January 3, 2003 Report Share Posted January 3, 2003 Yep- I'm looking time and direction. Up, down or sideways, and how long? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seamus Posted January 3, 2003 Report Share Posted January 3, 2003 looking to dump smh calls into the gap fill tween sox 315-20 here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrStool Posted January 3, 2003 Report Share Posted January 3, 2003 SiG has a unique genius for understanding Elliott. Like BB with Gann and other esoteric methods. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fxfox Posted January 3, 2003 Report Share Posted January 3, 2003 and what about that monster drain? They drain 14b and stocks go up later? Doc, say something, i am scared. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sweefraapp Posted January 3, 2003 Report Share Posted January 3, 2003 The Gang of 22 must pay AG 14B by 2:30PM est. Hope they need to sell something to come up with the scratch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PileDriver Posted January 3, 2003 Report Share Posted January 3, 2003 BEAS, DISH, QLGC, ESRX....my Preparation H Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrStool Posted January 3, 2003 Report Share Posted January 3, 2003 heh heh. All this passionate debate...the market's unchanged. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hypertiger Posted January 3, 2003 Report Share Posted January 3, 2003 Al's fingerprints are all over the gold plays to prop the dollar... Eventually they will lose control... Before it was short at 325 and buy at 310-317 now the top has moved up to 345-350. Its just paper IOU's... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GregFokker Posted January 3, 2003 Author Report Share Posted January 3, 2003 How do we know that 2:30EST is last call for the Gang of 22? I've heard it here lots, but never seen it referenced. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HardAssets Posted January 3, 2003 Report Share Posted January 3, 2003 Going for a lower high here and then payback at 2:30pm. I think we drop. Too many people think we go up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GregFokker Posted January 3, 2003 Author Report Share Posted January 3, 2003 A double top will be a very not happy event for the bullz. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 3, 2003 Report Share Posted January 3, 2003 The pump, the dump, the 1 day, 3 day, 5 day, 8 day, 20 week, 40 week.... blah blah blah....1 hour cycle highs, lows.... etc etc.... Its all about the E waves my friends.... the E Waves dont worry about time... and keep me out of trouble. Actually, it's pretty much the same. Cyclists think in terms of 4-year, 1-year, 6-month, etc. cycles; Elliotticians think in terms of "major cycle", "minor cycle", "minute cycle", etc. Cyclists worry whether the 10-13 cycle is dominating at the moment; Elliotticians wonder which one of the alternative wave counts is the right one. Both are ways of measuring and forecasting the movement of the psychology of the masses. And it's not true that e-waves don't worry about time. Elliott himself wrote that everything moves in cycles. Every e-wave has a target price and a target time for completion. It's just the particular rules applied by the two kinds of analysis that are different. Which is why it confuses me a lot that the e-waves and the cycles reach two so different conclusions in the case of gold... Regards, Vesselin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.