The brown one Posted August 28, 2004 Report Share Posted August 28, 2004 Plunger:Perhaps "the guys behind the scenes" just said to him that they had a plan to put eveything right--restore his popularity,stop the markets going headlong into the abyss and deprive the population of their rights to ever find out about the DoD's missing trillions. But he needed to have faith--he didn't know what the plan was but he would know when "the plan" was first implemented.An "event" would leave him in no doubt that salvation was at hand! Mind you,I'm just a huge conspiracy theorist--disclaimer! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 28, 2004 Report Share Posted August 28, 2004 This seems to be a pretty complete timeline: http://thewebfairy.com/killtown/sawplane.html If there's a great explanation for all of this, I'd love to hear it. If you were Kerry in a debate with Bush, and you actually wanted to win, wouldn't you ask GW whether or not it occured to him that it might be terrorism when he saw the first plane fly into the first tower as he watched on TV? I'd love to see the look on his face and hear the answer to that question. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NWD Posted August 28, 2004 Report Share Posted August 28, 2004 Iran has nukes (purportedly), and is threatening to use them on Americans who happen to be in Iraq. They do? My knowledge on this topic is less than encyclopedic. However, I was under the impression that they aren't there yet. US gov has raised commotion over their acquisition of equipment for manufacturing enriched uranium, an intermediate step in atomic bomb production. Also, U/Sec. of State Bolton recently asserted that representatives of British, German, and French governments received Iran's boast/confession that it is just three years away from production capability. So, if Iran has nuclear weapons, I infer it must have acquired them from some other country. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 28, 2004 Report Share Posted August 28, 2004 Israel uses paid Bedouin Muslims to inflict most of the death and destruction on the Gaza Palistineans. Why not use paid Iraqi thugs to attack Iran? Isn't that the direction the world is heading -- proxie armies of killers? Ask Poland what the hell it is doing in Iraq? Ask some of the non English speaking jackbooted thugs now patroling NYC what the hell they are doing here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NWD Posted August 28, 2004 Report Share Posted August 28, 2004 Ask some of the non English speaking jackbooted thugs now patroling NYC what the hell they are doing here. Say what?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 28, 2004 Report Share Posted August 28, 2004 Ask some of the non English speaking jackbooted thugs now patroling NYC what the hell they are doing here. Say what?! Sort of a student exchange program run wild. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NWD Posted August 28, 2004 Report Share Posted August 28, 2004 Interesting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pee Brain Posted August 28, 2004 Report Share Posted August 28, 2004 i suspect Israel makes a pre-emptive strike on Iran, who has threatened a pre-emptive strike on US. then we defend Israel's right to self defense. it would be easier if Syria were already gone and if Iran had an Iraqi front to contend with. what is terribly odd is bringing in an Iranain Gran Ayotollah to solve an Iraqi problem. at the least, this increases the likelihood of an eventual theocracy, at worst, who knows? im not real good with the political stuff anyway, but i doubt we are gonna sit quietly in Iraq. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 28, 2004 Report Share Posted August 28, 2004 Based on the news footage, it certainly does appear that the island of Manhattan is under a military invasion. The GOP thought they were tossing NYC a financial bone when they selected the City for its Convention...but in reality, this event appears to be capable of bankrupting the place given this level of security. More fear...24/7...all week long. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 28, 2004 Report Share Posted August 28, 2004 Here you go Plunger.......More and more see the hand of 990N ?Greenspan Put?, http://www.financialsense.com/fsu/editoria...ian/August.html It is these covert market interventions that are the most sinister and harmful to the markets. Since they are not publicly disclosed, there are no strict rules on how these manipulations are conducted. This gives market players who have access to the intervention a tremendous advantage. Any widespread market intervention will ultimately be discovered by market participants. If the authorities continue the charade, then participants will start to believe that the markets are ?rigged? and unfair. Such a loss of faith would be the equivalent of market pollution, easy to spoil but difficult to reclaim. There is a vigorous debate about whether such covert market manipulation is really occurring. Anecdotal evidence is building to support the accusation of widespread market intervention by government authorities and large institutions. Many investors now talk openly of the ?Greenspan Put?, referring to the belief that the Federal Reserve in conjunction with market authorities is actively supporting the markets with monetary policy and/or direct intervention. I believe that we are starting to see the effects of such covert policies on all of the financial markets. Currency markets are essentially dictated by government actions. Bond markets tremble under the threat of Central Bank purchases. Precious metals sag under the constant influx of supply by overt government sales and covert leasing. Stock markets anticipate the anonymous big buyer in the futures pits who places support under prices when the markets dive. In all of these markets, the primary object of investor interest is supposed to be the condition of earnings, interest rates, inflation, or supply and demand. However with many of today?s investors, the primary focus of interest is the timing and intensity of interventions. Because of this, we see pricing in many securities that make little sense. There are always securities that are mis-priced, but this seems to be the rule these days rather than the exception. The goal of manipulation appears to be to maintain the current pricing structure and avoid the consequences of a dramatic repricing event. :shocked Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 28, 2004 Report Share Posted August 28, 2004 The markets are being manipulated? Say it ain't so!!! This coming week will not be worth trading. The cynicism regarding the markets, as evidenced by the above article, combined with the fact that Manhattan appears to be quite an inhospitable environment for traders whose vacations are likely all planned for this week, leads one to believe that we are about to see the lowest volume week that the markets have seen in a very long time. Rest assured, if anything goes awry in Manhattan this week, they will simply shut the market down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hypertiger Posted August 28, 2004 Report Share Posted August 28, 2004 Ari Fleisher, citizen of Israel? Is what Barry Chamish calls a Sabbatean Zionist... The world of Barry Chamish Look folks...The report of an Israeli spy will only draw us closer to the Iron wall of Anti semitism... David Frum? the writer of the axis of evil speech? Is Jewish... The entire hirarchy of the US administration system is loaded with what Barry Chamish calls Sabbatean Zionists or their agents and other hired help... "NO question: This was Paul Wolfowitz's year. On September 15, 2001, at a meeting in Camp David, he advised President George W. Bush to skip Kabul and train American guns on Baghdad. In March 2003, he got his wish. In the process, Wolfowitz became the most influential US deputy defense secretary ever" Man of the Year: Paul Wolfowitz... "The war in Iraq was conceived by 25 neoconservative intellectuals, most of them Jewish, who are pushing President Bush to change the course of history" harretz Now it is up to you if you want to smash against the Iron wall of Anti semitism... I'm not going to because it is a trap...above is for information/entertainment only... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 28, 2004 Report Share Posted August 28, 2004 The markets are being manipulated? Say it ain't so!!! This coming week will not be worth trading. The cynicism regarding the markets, as evidenced by the above article, combined with the fact that Manhattan appears to be quite an inhospitable environment for traders whose vacations are likely all planned for this week, leads one to believe that we are about to see the lowest volume week that the markets have seen in a very long time. Rest assured, if anything goes awry in Manhattan this week, they will simply shut the market down. Have you ever tried to win a prize at a Carnival Game or win at Roulette? The same principal is operating .... the HOUSE wins. Chance is no longer chance ... chance has become a 'rigged' chance. Figure the probabilities of winning at BINGO or the LOTTERIES! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 28, 2004 Report Share Posted August 28, 2004 Based on the news footage, it certainly does appear that the island of Manhattan is under a military invasion. The GOP thought they were tossing NYC a financial bone when they selected the City for its Convention...but in reality, this event appears to be capable of bankrupting the place given this level of security. More fear...24/7...all week long. America is being militarized domestically. The RNC in NYC is what the neocons would call a preseason game for the real show when we have a full police state and the need to control rebelling serfs aka "domestic terrorists". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hypertiger Posted August 28, 2004 Report Share Posted August 28, 2004 Israeli spy? hahahaha only one? you've got to be joking... Alan Greenspan took the number 1 spot in 2002 on the list of the worlds 50 most Influential Jews... Jewsweek the story has ceased to exist at Jewsweek maybe you can find it...lucky I made a copy. Below is the writeup for the number 1 and 2 spot... frome the article... "Something to consider when perusing this list: You will see some "small local" people higher up on the list than some of the big power brokers. That's because being an influential Jew means touching people's lives and helping promote the Jewish ideal of "being a light unto the nations." That is why you'll see Rebbetzin Miriam Feldman (13) ahead of say, Mortimer Zuckerman (14) because of the intense impact she has within her community. As the Talmud teaches, those who save one life have saved a world entire. Finally, keep this in mind. If you didn't make it on the list this year - keep trying. 1. Alan Greenspan The country is in an economic downward spiral. Since January, companies have announced 652,510 layoffs - and more are announced each day. People are not looking to Superman to save the day. They are looking to one person, and one person only. As Federal Reserve Chairman, Alan Greenspan is, hands down, the most influential Jew in America. He is, some would argue, the most influential person in America. With each interest rate cut - another is expected this week - this 74-year-old contains the key to an economic turnaround in this time of recession. When he speaks, the world listens. Besides that, he's the economy's most optimistic cheerleader. "With all our concerns about the next several quarters, there is still, in my judgment, ample evidence that we are experiencing only a pause," he said in a speech recently. 2. Ruth Bader Ginsburg The buck stops with Justice Ginsburg. And so did the election. In Bush v. Gore, Ginsburg helped shape the national agenda for the next four years. And with the Supreme Court making significant decisions on a daily basis, her role as part of the elite group of top decision- makers in this country makes her all that more influential. What's more, the Court's recent decision in Good News Club v. Milford Central School, as well as President Bush's unwavering desire for faith-based initiatives, takes issues of religion off the back- burner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.