Jump to content

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest yobob1

B4 the Bell Wiki Tiki Endi

Recommended Posts

The only way Iraq might be taken is to commit massive levels of human civilian atrocities and even then, it's a complete crap shoot. The American public won't stand for it and the Arabs --well, that goes without saying. That's where the Russians come in. Buschco, can sit back and go tsk tsk while Putin does a Chechnya on Najaaf. Think this might be the game plan. Russia is increasing its troop levels and defence spending at the present time.

 

How on earth does the administration plan to "subdue" Iran and Saudi Arabia, when they can't get a grip on Iraq? They may have mushroom clouds in mind. You never know. They're very keen on these new Bunker busting noooklear bombs, which is pretty ominous.

 

Foreign policy formulated by Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, OH and Moe Larry and Curly!

 

Hi Hat, Good to hear you're okay. The cat thing had an Auntie Em, Auntie Em feel to it, with you cast as (You and your little cat ToTo too!") Margaret Hamilton.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For future reference...Wrap kitty in towel (Kitty Burrito), shove all into cat carrier, lock door.

 

You make Kitty Scared

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

 

Plunger

 

I couldn't agree with you more.

From my first post ever...

 

I fully believe a big part of the reason we have entered bubble 2 is because of the pension liability 10 sigma event that was staring corporate America in the face last year. The pension issue had to be repaired. It seems this manipulated runup in the markets is having the desired effect. However,with non pro forma valuations at hysterical extremes I am convinced "they" will fail. The question is, Its not knowing what will happen but WHEN?

 

Fast forward 10 months...

 

 

As an example Air Canada went into bankruptcy last year because of pension liabilities. We have reorganized and SHOULD reemerge September 30. Did AC learn anything from exposure to the bubble? NO of course not. The employees defined benefit pension plans are still over 70% exposed to the stock market. No restructuring there. I am 100% convinced that we will be bankrupt once again when the market tanks. Pensions will be a disaster. My warnings are laughed at by the people that could bring about change. Until our defined benefit pension plans are changed to defined contribution, Air Canada will be held hostage to a very overvalued equities market. Sadly it is not to be.

 

Thanks for the heads up on Maudlin.

More artillery for my endless plight.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Still Stalled

 

Total Bank Credit Flat, The Hidden Money Supply Collapse

 

Fed Releases update is now posted! Once a week Doc fills you in on the all important Fed weekly releases. Doc gives you his briefs on the charts of the Fed's most important money and credit measures. Take a subscribatory and download your Fed Releases RIGHT NOW!

30 Day Intro Subscribatory. Just $16.99! Get In RIGHT NOW!

 

30 Day Intro Subscribatory. Just $16.99! Get In RIGHT NOW!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest

And the BRAINLESS ONE wants to put part of the social security $$$$, on an individual basis, into the market with ZERO GUARANTEES...pun intended.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
John Mauldin talks about the pension Debtberg:

 

But what if the Dow drops to 6,000 as it might during the next recession and the NASDAQ goes to 600? What if your returns are negative for the next few years?

 

How much are you underfunded then, as your portfolio drops another 20 percent? The number becomes mind-boggling. If each of the S&P 500 companies lowered its expected rate of return from the current average of 9.2 percent to 6.5 percent, the total cost to earnings would be $30 billion, according to a report by CSFB. But if the Dow drops to 6,000 the number goes off the chart. Remember, the average drop in the markets is 43% during recessions.

 

Pension Peril

 

Mauldin fails to mention that Congress passed a 'law' earlier this year, allowing companies to assume a rate of return on pension assets based on the yield on corporate debt, which is of course higher than the Treasury yield used in the past.

 

There's a couple of things wrong with that. One is that the use of the Treasury yield had been conservative -- if future payments can be accurately projected, they can be funded with zero-coupon Treasury bonds with certainty. Corporate bonds are subject to default risk, and part of the default risk involves heavy pension obligations -- a potential self-feeding vicious spiral.

 

What's worse, though, is that most pension plans are heavily allocated into equities. In raising its rate of return assumptions, Corporate America has made a gigantic bet that not only is the stock market going to "bounce back," it's going to embark on another record-setting secular bull run, like 1982-2000.

 

That's a stupid, hopeless, sucker bet. It sets up a feedback loop in which lower stock prices force higher pension contributions, which lowers earnings, which lowers stock prices again and ... etc.

machinehead,

I could be wrong, but I seem to recall that the provision allowing use of corporate yields as a discount rate is only in effect for 2 years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Still Stalled

 

Total Bank Credit Flat, The Hidden Money Supply Collapse

Doug Noland seems to be leaning toward the HyperTiger denouement:

 

"s there a meaningful risk of hyper-inflation developing? I don't think so....I would ... expect the risk of a major pricing cataclysym is more on the downside (systemic debt collapse) than upside (hyper-inflation)."

 

Credit Bubble Bulletin: "The Fragile Stability Of Monetary Disorder," 13 August 2004 http://www.prudentbear.com/creditbubblebulletin.asp

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This could go very, very bad.

Only one solution - truce to withdraw. My opine.

Of course the assholes running this invasion are more

likely to use nukes. I wouldn't put it past them.

They don't give a shit for human life.

 

Just look at the results so far - what have we gotten from this fiasco?

Nothing but dead people, massive deficit and latent shame.

 

You know who should be ashamed of themselves, but their not and they

will never repent. So expect the worst. It's a 'religious war' now and

is out of control.

 

But the generals and congress are saying 'We must prevail.'

Butts. End result is escalation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest

The IEA said it has underestimated oil use for years and is recognizing that demand now in an annual review. The change comes from higher-than-estimated use in nations outside the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).

 

"This probably helps explain why prices are as high as they are," said Adam Sieminski, Deutsche Bank AG's oil strategist in London. "OPEC is struggling to meet demand for its crude oil."

 

The 11-nation Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) is pumping near its limits to keep up with demand and build inventories. Crude oil topped US$45 on Tuesday for the first time in the 21-year history of futures trading in New York.

 

World demand will jump by 1.8 million barrels a day in 2005, after a record gain of 2.5 million this year, the IEA said, confirming previous forecasts.

 

http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/english/doc/2...tent_364964.htm

 

 

 

The price of oil went through $46 (U.S.) a barrel yesterday, setting another record high. Many energy experts say $50 -- a figure unthinkable only a couple of years ago -- is likely. At least one oil anal cyst says $100 is possible. In 1998, the price was about $14. In 2002, it was about $27. How did glut turn into shortage so quickly?

 

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/Art...ness/TopStories

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beleive me, the west wont fail because of some shitty bearded nutcases somewhere in the middle east.

FxFox - Ah the eloquance of those words. I never knew Hidelberg could produce such diplomatic phrases. :grin: :wink2:

yeah, i thought, why talking around the hot pie? Just focus and then make your point crystal clear.

 

Butr i have to say, im a bit shocked by myself. I have to admit sounds a bit too limbaughatic. :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
machinehead,

I could be wrong, but I seem to recall that the provision allowing use of corporate yields as a discount rate is only in effect for 2 years.

You're right:

 

Pension Funding Equity Act

 

The excuse was that the Treasury's 2001 "Halloween Day massacre" of the 30-year T-bond forced the change. But they've substituted a higher corporate yield.

 

Two years from now, if the Dow is at 6000, I guess they'll have to use junk yields ... a composite of Brazilian, Argentine, Russian and Turkish debt would be just dandy. :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The arbas should be carefull: They can play their game to a certain extend, if th3ey overextend it, they have to face consequences, of which they better dont think about yet.

 

One shoildnt be naive: This aint Vietnam. Much mcuh mucccchhhhhhh more is at cost here. Beleive me, the west wont fail because of some shitty bearded nutcases somewhere in the middle east. If they go too far, they will get their Hiroshima, only 10 times worse.

:mellow:

 

Yeah, those arabs have some serious explaining to do...like how did OUR oil end up under their sand in the first place? :angry:

 

Answer me that you "shitty bearded nutcases".

 

:unsure: :ph34r:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

of course you are right.

 

But I see it relaistic: Without a sufficient oil supply we are doomed. Plain and simple.

 

Sure every country should have the right to explore the ressources which are under their surface. But thats theory, reality looks different. You can also take the DeBeers mafiosi as an example. They own large parts of Namibia, the namibian state gets no single cent of those diamonds which DeBeers exploits under the namibian surface.

 

 

We beat them in Portiers, we beat them in Vienna, if necessary we bomb them to Havanna :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest

US plans to cut forces overseas by 70,000

The US is expected to announce on Monday that it is pulling 70,000 troops out of Europe and Asia in the largest restructuring of its global military presence since the second world war.

 

People briefed on the plan say two-thirds of the reductions will come in Europe, most of them military personnel stationed in Germany who will be sent back to US bases.

 

An additional 100,000 support staff and military families worldwide will be part of the realignment.

 

http://news.ft.com/cms/s/117d14c8-ed63-11d...000e2511c8.html

 

 

 

While the article indicates that these troops will return to the US, I suspect they

will be re-deployed to the Middle East.

If so, the plus side is they will not be accompanied by families, an expensive element

at best. Wherever families are located, the military services try to employ family members vs others who might be even more highly qualified.

This makes happier soldiers and gives a higher household income, but the practice

of co-located families also expands the size of govt due to required family services

(support services) for medical, housing, schools, legal, and all the other goodies you would get if you lived in the USA. No value judgement offered as I have worked Community Service issues as part of my assignment at SANG some years ago.

Shit for housing, dysfunctional family relations, cover-ups for drug use by Officer's

kids.... yadda yadda! And God forbid we should discuss the alcoholism amongst the Officers themselves... "it didnt exist" Official Denial was the game.

(I originally joined Federal Service to establish an "Alcoholism program" for

civilian and military/family members at our installation. What a nightmare!)

SANG was the place that all MI military members with problems were returned to.

 

While it may be more exciting to follow the progress of military might and its successes, the real human tragedies of the individual soldier and his family

go unrecognized. It is far different from the performance pressures in the corporate world because the rewards are not dollars but just a bunch of medals, honor and glory. How much can you buy with that? Many military families are on welfare.

Officers have a far better deal than the grunts. Most of our soldiers are grunts.

Its a poverty class that we as a Nation should be ashamed of!

How in the name of God and all sorts of value systems can we send these guys/gals

off to fight in combat (so we don't have to go) and fail to give them the dignity of

sufficient pay and support benefits beyond the survival level?

I haven't even touched on a war's byproduct of injured and disabled.

The Bush Admin cut the funding needed to take care of them.

 

(rant off)

 

Yes, its all about oil. About the time the war started in Iraq, the US Military

began building a huge military base north of Bahgdad that is intended to be

the supreme center of satellite/surveylance of the entire Middle East. We will

be able to "see" what is going on in every surrounding country and then some.

The imperative need to build this base has caused most other projects in Iraq to

fall FAR behind schedule. Iraqi's do not have clean water, reliable electricity, or

basic human safety, but that base is being built.

So for all the good words, for all the ontheground battles, etc., the primary

objective is the building of that base to provide the type of stronghold that

our bases in Germany provided against the Soviets.

Issue: the German people willingly accepted our bases in their country.

The Iraqi and ME peoples do not.

What will be the outcome?

 

Rambling thoughts by Sherlock

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


Stock market portfolio giving you the runs? See Dr. Stool.

Take a subscribatory!
Download 
The Anals of Stock Proctology now!



The Daily Stool - Stock Market Message Board
Stool's Gold- Gold and Precious Metals Forum
Look Out Below Message Board

Support your local Stool Board.


The Al E. Greenspeuman designer line at Stoolmart. Get yours today! Click here now!



Old Stool Depository


The Wall Street Examiner
Subscribe to the Wall Street Examiner
Contact Us




Market Quotes are powered by Investing.com.
×