Takachi Posted January 9, 2003 Report Share Posted January 9, 2003 Doc, congrats on most users ever today - 214! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soup Posted January 9, 2003 Report Share Posted January 9, 2003 Where are the warnings? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FeedFool Posted January 9, 2003 Report Share Posted January 9, 2003 Yes, but deflation implies that the value of the dollar goes up against stuff. But if the dollar goes down in forex, what are the implications? This is how I see it. We get deflation in all assets but it will cost more to live because the essentials items will cost more like foods, Gas, insurance, and anything u need to survive. All the non-essential items will drop. Lack of demand will drive prices down but one will still need to eat. Global weather change will also reduce food supply. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richmtn Posted January 9, 2003 Report Share Posted January 9, 2003 OK everyone you can resume breathing again. Let's not have any dead bears. If it's not there sit on your hands. Better yet sit on your partners hands. Rich have u got any target? Do u thing those gaps in sky will get filled? Feed I don't have price targets. I know everyone reads Doc's Anals, or should. The 10-13 week cycle is up. I will not bet against it and I am not good enough to scalp the wild moves. I have quite a few charts on Night Stool. Some have Fib Times Zones pointing to mid Feb. That should coincide with the 10-13 week top and possibly the WAR. Richt now I'm concidering shorting gold miners. If it's good enough for K Wave it's certainly good enough for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest hemroid2 Posted January 9, 2003 Report Share Posted January 9, 2003 african weather is a mess...people cant even grow crops there....that pop off 920 was preety strong Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FeedFool Posted January 9, 2003 Report Share Posted January 9, 2003 KO- 212, 900 shares bought @ 44.53 ... (not my trade ) There is a bullish wedge on KO. I will buy some when it hit the bottom line. Gap may get filled? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
simple guy Posted January 9, 2003 Report Share Posted January 9, 2003 QQQ wrap 6.7 m shares net accumulated today. Money Flow 140 m positive... SG did NOT short at close as I was in a meeting, probably good. 27.30 continues to loom as possible mini C wave top.... Hoping for a big pop in the AM tomorrow so I can then re-enter my shorts... Meantime, cash seems to be king and patience is a virtue... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soup Posted January 9, 2003 Report Share Posted January 9, 2003 test Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PileDriver Posted January 9, 2003 Report Share Posted January 9, 2003 i'm so pissed i did not hang on to the long side,bailed way too early. I always take the hundreds and leave the thousands on the table. keep it simple. Once in I follow a 4,8 day ema with a stop at 13 day EMA to see if the trend is [still] in my favor. One of the reasons the screamers I bought Jan 2 I still have for a big fat juicy outrageous profit. The trend is your friend, don't second guess or front run it. No need to be a hero who called the turn. When a turn REALLY happens 85% of the time there is still plenty of time to grab it. PATIENCE grasshopper, getting IN *AND* getting OUT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 9, 2003 Report Share Posted January 9, 2003 STX .43 estimates were .27 FWIW...THer are no anal cyst coverage or earnings estimates for STX according to Bloomberg, additionally i belive STX is an a quite period due to recent ipo and therefore would be prohibited from giving earnings estimates. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soup Posted January 9, 2003 Report Share Posted January 9, 2003 Seagate Tech reports Q2 (STX) 12.60 +0.40: Reports Q2 (Dec) earnings of $0.43 per share; revenues rose 6.4% year/year to $1.73 bln. Company is a recent IPO, which started trading on 12/10 and has no anal cyst estimates at this point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrHanky Posted January 9, 2003 Report Share Posted January 9, 2003 i'm so pissed i did not hang on to the long side,bailed way too early. I always take the hundreds and leave the thousands on the table. keep it simple. Once in I follow a 4,8 day ema with a stop at 13 day EMA to see if the trend is [still] in my favor. One of the reasons the screamers I bought Jan 2 I still have for a big fat juicy outrageous profit. The trend is your friend, don't second guess or front run it. No need to be a hero who called the turn. When a turn REALLY happens 85% of the time there is still plenty of time to grab it. PATIENCE grasshopper, getting IN *AND* getting OUT. been calling the turns pretty good.but I have no confidence in my call,so i bail when there is any profit...not letting it run enough to make any real cash. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrHanky Posted January 9, 2003 Report Share Posted January 9, 2003 stx is up over 3 bucks in less than a week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 9, 2003 Report Share Posted January 9, 2003 CBOE Put/Call 3:00 PM CST Equity 0.68 Index 0.99 Overall 0.75 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fartpolio Manager Posted January 9, 2003 Report Share Posted January 9, 2003 STX .43 estimates were .27 FWIW...THer are no anal cyst coverage or earnings estimates for STX according to Bloomberg, additionally i belive STX is an a quite period due to recent ipo and therefore would be prohibited from giving earnings estimates. Yes, you are quite right, I did hear one estimate of .27 from another fund manager... that's what he was expecting. Sorry for any confusion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.