Jump to content

Asia Sells, Europe Buys, and the US (Fill in the blank- there's no right or wrong answer) 1/26/22

Rate this topic


Recommended Posts

  • DrStool changed the title to Asia Sells, Europe Buys, and the US (Fill in the blank- there's no right or wrong answer) 1/26/22

But in classic bull action, they just pulled back to the upper channel trendline just broken, did a hot stove touch and resumed their upward trek, confirming the validity of the breakout. 

Now approaching a test of Wednesday's high. 

tvc_9471e2461f47c4ffba9253fc1014e13e.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"The honorable Judge Wilkins, a chemical engineer by training, told the FCC: “ I am inclined to rule against you, ” which is a rare and strong statement from a judge."

 

On January 25  we had oral arguments in our landmark case against the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. The hearing went VERY WELL. 

Our case challenges the FCC’s refusal to review its 25-year-old obsolete wireless “health guidelines” and to adopt scientific, biologically based radio frequency emissions rules that adequately protect public health from wireless devices and infrastructure, including 5G. After the hearing, we do indeed feel that we are closer than ever to FCC accountability!

Both Children’s Health Defense and the Environmental Health Trust filed cases against the FCC but filed the briefs jointly. While EHT has been represented by attorney Ed Meyers, because of a court decision that only one attorney will be allowed to present, Scott McCollough, CHD’s attorney, represented both CHD and EHT Petitioners in the oral arguments.We asked Mr. Meyers to join our press conference. He has a time conflict but will do his best to change his prior obligation and join us. 

The judges asked excellent questions and showed in-depth knowledge of the case. The honorable Judge Wilkins, a chemical engineer by training, told the FCC: “ I am inclined to rule against you, ” which is a rare and strong statement from a judge. 

The honorable Judge Millet consistently pushed the FCC to answer why the FCC and/or the FDA didn’t review the evidence on non-cancer effects of wireless technology; why they addressed only cell phones when there is evidence on effects from various other devices and infrastructure; and why they didn’t address the cumulative effects from the chronic exposure for numerous devices.

Judge Millet said to the FCC attorney: “ How was it reasonable for the FCC to rely so heavily on a response from the FDA that … did not address the very things you asked for information on: other devices, the use of multiple devices and physical harms other than cancer? “  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks to the gentleman who just supported your local Stool Board. 😊 Always appreciated! 😊 

The Donate button near the top of the sidebar, in case you are looking! 😉

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Tell a friend

    Love Stool Pigeons Wire Message Board? Tell a friend!
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • ×
    • Create New...