Jump to content

Fur Yew Ta Jockeys: Of Vixen 'n Such Lol


BAREister

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 20
  • Created
  • Last Reply

BARE, Hamilton is wrong on this one. As machinehead noted on M2M, the volatility inidexes don't trade like a normal stock. They spend most of their time range-bound and spike up rarely and for a short while only. They should be treated more like oscillators; not like stocks. Using moving averages, short-term trendlines, Bollinger bands, etc. on them is OK. Using Elliott Waves, chart patterns (especially long-term ones), etc. I meaningless.

 

Regards,

Vesselin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dunno about the e-wave anal stuff but I do know that these often chart well with t-lines and patterns. best doug

My Webpage :P

post-13-1045408792.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In Edgar Peters's book Chaos and Order in the Capital Markets, he sets out evidence that many natural processes, from annual flood levels of the Nile to stock indeces, have a 'memory effect.' This means that trends, once set in motion, tend to persist. As compared to the 'white noise' of a coin flip or random electrical static, stock market time series are 'pink noise' which includes a trending (autocorrelation) effect.

 

By contrast, Peters makes the startling assertion that volatility is ANTI-TRENDING. That is, volatilty actually tends to reverse itself more often than a coin flip series. He claims that volatility is perhaps the only known occurrence in nature of such an anti-trending series.

 

Elliott wave is inherently based on trends. Now if Edgar Peters is correct that volatility is anti-trending, there may be some "anti-Elliott" discipline for charting it. (Three waves up, five waves down? Naw, just kidding.)

 

But for sure, applying a trend analysis technique (Elliott wave) to an anti-trending series is about as useful as hunting deer with an accordian. But what the hell ... even a coin-flip guess has a 50-50 chance of being right. I call it 'tails' (Vesselin's chart) instead of 'heads' (Hamilton's chart).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is a weekly chart drawn on a closing basis. This one is clearly showing a breakout. :o

My Webpage

post-13-1045455578.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bont

Thats a daily chart you have there. Try it on a weekly and I would think that you come up with a different picture.

best to ya doug

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah, indeed.

 

Hm, I've often seen patterns which were already present on the daily charts be not present yet on the weekly or monthly charts. But this is the first time I see a pattern which is present on the weekly charts but isn't yet present on the daily chart...

 

Anyway, I don't believe it. The VXN isn't going to explode now. Most likely, we'll have yet another bear bounce first. Just about everything I've looked at says so - the various indexes, gold, dollar, everything.

 

Regards,

Vesselin

post-13-1045465241_thumb.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree about the bounce bont. I could even see the vxn drop as low as the 43 area but for now its a breakout until proven otherwise. regards doug

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another excellent discussion...I use MACD on VIX and VXN with decent results, used in conjunciton with other indicators. It seems to be the best way to discern pattern, although I would not give up on possible Elliott wave interpretations...on the level of "if I see wave structure, I pay attention to them."

 

Is QQ the symbol for QQQ volatility?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I know about NDX and QQV, but the other day I inadvertently typed 2 Q's instead of 3 and there before me was the QQQ volatility index. I was surprised because I was unaware of it and had not seen it mentioned here on the Great Capitalstool.

 

Anyone have any experience with tracking this? Right now, it's closed below its 55-dma, a bullish signal, and it appears as if the MACD has peaked and is about to give a bullish signal. Looks like we might be going from fear back to complacency, at least s/t.

 

You know what, thinking about it, I disagree that these volatility indices do not trend. I think we use them to see if volatility is trending toward "fear," the higher readings, or toward "complacency," the lower readings. Those are definitely trends, hence, there's trend being measured.

 

Right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My Webpagewww.chartsmarts.comMy Webpage :o I agree about the trending thing Sloth. I have found these indexes to chart very well at times. :D

post-13-1045528518.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Stool Pigeons Wire Message Board? Tell a friend!
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • ×
    • Create New...