Jump to content

What It's All About


Guest

Recommended Posts

FWIW

 

23.91 on the Q's would be nearly a perfect 61.8% fibo retrace of the late afternoon 5 wave decline on Friday.

 

It would also be a nice A B C mini wave 2...

 

It would also slightly alter my Q target near term to about 23.26

 

Otherwise, shall she go much higher... it would count as just more frustration, but the trend will remain lower lows, lower highs... light volume, major selloff still in the offing...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 154
  • Created
  • Last Reply
3.  The dumb woman host says... Greenspan talks on Tuesday, so he will probably not say anything negative about the economy... (uh... actually, he probably will)

Just the stupid politicians, who each want him to bless their public policies for getting the economy out of the rut it's in. In other words, Greenspam has become a political pawn and nothing more. Sure, there are a few whores left on Wall Street who idolize the man. But, for all practical purposes, his fifteen minutes are over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's another one:

 

"Salomon Smith Barney institutional equity strategist Tobias Levkovich said the U.S. equity markets "are attractive from a valuation perspective," given that long-term growth expectations have come down significantly from the highs of the late 1990s. He noted that price-to-earnings multiples for the S&P 500 have dropped to levels that have traditionally marked the most opportune time to buy stocks."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He noted that price-to-earnings multiples for the S&P 500 have dropped to levels that have traditionally marked the most opportune time to buy stocks."

Talk about picking and choosing your facts. This clown relies on market history to come up with his "valuations at traditional bear market bottoms." Yet, what he doesn't mention is that the "E" in his valuation equation is anything but historical. It's based on a modern notion of "E," which is so far from historical definitions, it's not even funny. At the very least, these a-holes should be asked to explain what "E" they are using.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Leftabitch is obviously using the Fed model which doesn't work and never will work because it relates stock valuation to bond yields. The mode; assumes bond yields are stable and permanent, and that stock earnings yields carry no more risk than the risk on Treasury bonds. The whole theory is based on a series of lies. Bond yields have never been stable, and stocks have never been risk free.

 

Of course the model also assumes that we know what earnings are. There's the biggest joke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Stool Pigeons Wire Message Board? Tell a friend!
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • ×
    • Create New...