Jump to content

SiP

Members
  • Posts

    368
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Posts posted by SiP

  1. 5 hours ago, BurntOnce said:

    "The honorable Judge Wilkins, a chemical engineer by training, told the FCC: “ I am inclined to rule against you, ” which is a rare and strong statement from a judge."

     

    On January 25  we had oral arguments in our landmark case against the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. The hearing went VERY WELL. 

    Our case challenges the FCC’s refusal to review its 25-year-old obsolete wireless “health guidelines” and to adopt scientific, biologically based radio frequency emissions rules that adequately protect public health from wireless devices and infrastructure, including 5G. After the hearing, we do indeed feel that we are closer than ever to FCC accountability!

    Both Children’s Health Defense and the Environmental Health Trust filed cases against the FCC but filed the briefs jointly. While EHT has been represented by attorney Ed Meyers, because of a court decision that only one attorney will be allowed to present, Scott McCollough, CHD’s attorney, represented both CHD and EHT Petitioners in the oral arguments.We asked Mr. Meyers to join our press conference. He has a time conflict but will do his best to change his prior obligation and join us. 

    The judges asked excellent questions and showed in-depth knowledge of the case. The honorable Judge Wilkins, a chemical engineer by training, told the FCC: “ I am inclined to rule against you, ” which is a rare and strong statement from a judge. 

    The honorable Judge Millet consistently pushed the FCC to answer why the FCC and/or the FDA didn’t review the evidence on non-cancer effects of wireless technology; why they addressed only cell phones when there is evidence on effects from various other devices and infrastructure; and why they didn’t address the cumulative effects from the chronic exposure for numerous devices.

    Judge Millet said to the FCC attorney: “ How was it reasonable for the FCC to rely so heavily on a response from the FDA that … did not address the very things you asked for information on: other devices, the use of multiple devices and physical harms other than cancer? “  

     

    I've listen to 30 first minutes of the hearing and it was actually in favour of FCC. Its all about this hogwash https://bioinitiative.org/ , Ramazzini Study on Radiofrequency Cell Phone Radiation  etc

    its all been presented and killed before.

    BTW, there isnt such a diseases as electrohypersensitive. Its people imagination

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_hypersensitivity

     

    More over EMF which comes from SUN and many other sources are murch stronger them EMF generated by mobile.

    Its like taking those OTC (over the counter) pills for let say broken lashes or any other bullshit that is advertised in TV.

  2. 6 hours ago, BurntOnce said:
    investors are shrugging off a most important case against the FCC and the wireless industry.
    Eat this, Crapple!
     
    Today: Press Conference and Oral Arguments in the Landmark Case on 5G, Wireless and Cell Phone Tower Radiation
     
    Environmental Health Trust et al. v. Federal Communications Commission
    DATE: Monday January 25, 2021
     
    PRESS CONFERENCE
    Time: Monday, January 25, 2021 at 2 p.m. EST
    Devra Davis PhD, MPH will review the court proceedings with EHT’s attorney Edward B. Myers.
     
     
     
    Environmental Health Trust, the environmental health organization led by Dr. Devra Davis, a member of the team awarded the Nobel Peace Prize as a lead author for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change scientists, will hold a press conference following the Monday morning oral arguments at the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia in the landmark case Environmental Health Trust (EHT) et al. v. the Federal Communications Commission (FCC).  
     
    EHT et al. v. the FCC seeks to have the Court order the FCC to remand, vacate and update its 25-year-old exposure guidelines for radio-frequency radiation (RFR) from cell phones, cell towers, Wi-Fi, 5G and other wireless communication devices.
     
    After consolidation in the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, the legal briefs were filed jointly with Children's Health Defense(CHD), Consumers for Safer Phones and numerous other petitioners including Elizabeth Barris, Theodora Scarato MSW, Michelle Hertz, Petra Broken, Dr. David Carpenter, Dr. Toril Jelter, Dr. Paul Dart, Dr. Ann Lee, Virginia Farver, Jennifer Baran and Paul Stanley M.Ed.
     
    EHT is represented by Edward B. Myers who intervened in the successful case of the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) and several Native American Tribes against the FCC when the Court upheld the relevance of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) in FCC’s 5G proceedings. 
     
    CHD is represented by Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Chairman of Children’s Health Defense, who has championed numerous cases involving industrial pollution -including Monsanto Roundup weedkiller cancer litigation and major land and water contamination cases- and by Scott McCullough, a seasoned telecom attorney and former Assistant Texas Attorney General who represented the Irregulators in Irregulators vs the FCC. McCullough will present EHT, CHD and Petitioners’ joint case in oral argument.
     
    Oral Arguments 
    The oral arguments in the case are scheduled for Monday, January 25, 2021 at 9:30 a.m. and audio will be livestreamed. The three-judge panel in the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia that presides over the case includes the Honorable Karen Henderson, Patricia Millett and Robert Wilkins.
     
    The Petitioners contend the FCC ignored the extensive evidence submitted to the agency showing that non-thermal levels of pulsed and modulated RFR emitted by wireless technology are harmful to humans, wildlife and the environment, and its order failed to provide a record of a reasoned decision making. Therefore, the Petitioners claim the FCC has violated the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) and its decision is capricious, arbitrary and not evidence-based. In addition, the Petitioners argue that the FCC violated NEPA because the agency did not consider the environmental impacts of its decision. FCC also violated the 1996 Telecommunications Act (TCA) in failing to consider the impact of its decision on public health and safety.
     
    The FCC ignored numerous submissions detailing injuries and rapidly growing illnesses from radiofrequency radiation, and ignored calls such as those from the cities of Boston and Philadelphia to address the injury. Petitioners argued that the inadequate FCC guidelines are used to deny accommodation in violation of the Americans with Disability Act. The Petitioners filed 11,000 pages of evidence - 447 exhibits in 27 Volumes- in support of their claims. Environmental Health Trust filed 60 of the 447 exhibits.
     
    “Environmental Health Trust has worked for over a decade to protect the public from radiofrequency radiation, testified to Congress and published critical research on why children are more vulnerable,” said Devra Davis PhD, MPH, President and founder of Environmental Health Trust. “Over the years, the FCC has ignored our extensive submissions that clearly document harm. As the legacies of lead, asbestos and tobacco teach us, this issue deserves immediate attention from our federal government in order to protect our children’s health now and throughout their lives.” 
     
    The NRDC filed an amicus brief in the Petitioners’ case on the need for environmental review signed onto by Mayors and Councilmembers from Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, California and Hawaii. Attorney Joe Sandri filed an Amicus Brief with a statement by Dr. Linda Birnbaum, former Director of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences of the National Institutes of Health and former Director of the National Toxicology Program (NTP) who detailed the findings of the NTP and concluded, “Overall, the NTP findings demonstrate the potential for RFR to cause cancer in humans.” The Building Biology Institute and Kleiber family filed Briefs on injuries sustained from exposures allowed by FCC exposure guidelines.” 

    Hey

    this is bullshit. 

    no cancer from mobile or wifi. 

    this is all, fake news, distributed or powered by russia in order to decrease the tempo of our productivity and speed of life. 

    Russia ia around 5 to 10 years late in terms of 5G and thats why you have so many fake news on 5g and cancer made by EMF. 

     

    go to emfexplained.info or many other webpages, also supported by WHO ICNIRP etc. 

  3. overall market valuations are below the historical average when Treasury yields, corporate credit and cash are taken into account.

     

    That’s a view echoed by Citigroup. The global strategy team led by Robert Buckland weighed global equity prices on both a relative and historic basis and concluded even expensive U.S. shares could have much more room to run.

     

    “We would never advise anybody to chase a bubble,” they wrote on Friday. “It could burst at any time. But if CAPEs were to hit previous highs then the U.S. indices could go up another 50-100%. And that’s just looking at absolute valuations. If we measure against bond yields then even the Nasdaq looks cheap.”

    https://ca.finance.yahoo.com/news/bubble-fears-everywhere-investors-keep-131515970.html

  4. 9 hours ago, DrStool said:

    Hey SiP- I've been on Otodom, looking for an apartment in Sródmieście and Wola. Even with the USD collapse, they are still extremely cheap for an American. I mean the idea of getting a prime downtown apartment in a world class national capital for $700-750/mo is crazy. Even though last year it would have been 650. 🙃

    I hope to go to Warsaw for 3 months to do some genealogy research and see the homeland of my ancestors. My grandfather came from Makow Mazowiecky. I found his birth registered in Nowy Dwor. My grandmother and great grandfather lived in Zychlin before coming to US.  Found my grandfather's birth record but haven't been able to find my babcia yet. 

    In terms of price, its all about

    1. local salaries

    2. USD Strenght

    In terms of USD, USDPLN is still pretty high (3.65) having in mind that before GFC it touched 2.0

    so for a person with USD - yeap, its cheap now. 

    more over Polish gov wants to implement more export driven policy which means weaker PLN vs USD or EUR. Even just new year and Xmax there were 3 CB interventions (by NBP, polish central bank) so they could send more money to gov. coffers. so they push Usdpln higher by selling PLN. 

     

    In terms of salaries, those are 50% lower than in advanced economies and the biggest difference is betaeen us and Ireland. Thats also a good example since Irish minimum wage is the biggest in EU and equals 1900 something EUR (so around 15 USD per hour which Biden wants in US, so the same as in Dublin) 

    polish minimum wage is around 620 EUR (750 USD). 

    avg pay in Warsaw is of course higher (capital of Poland) and equals 900 EUR.

     

    in terms of rent

    1 room 2000 PLN

    2 rooms around 2500 PLN

    3 rooms closer to 3200 PLN

    please take a loot at the description since you CANT compare prices of rents in Poland. there is no standard. 

    So some ads have official administrative rent included in the offering, but some people put info in ads, that you need to pay for adm. rent (it depends on apartment size starting at 400 PLN till 1000 PLN for big apartments with 4 rooms) 

    So do check whether the official community rent ia added. 

    In terms of rents, well, due to covid there was a 24% drop (!) in rents in Warsaw so ita a good time for you  come. 

    let me know when you would be in Poland, I could help you like with mobile phone ("njumobile" is the cheapest and "Premium mobile") which you could buy in groceries stores, peteol station or via internet (DHL, UPS will come to your home to check your ID). 

     

    Best! 

     

×
  • Create New...